Literature DB >> 16171714

Hemodynamic evaluation of saphenous vein coronary artery bypass grafts: relative merits of Doppler flow velocity and SPECT perfusion imaging.

Liesbeth P Salm1, Jeroen J Bax, J Wouter Jukema, Susan E Langerak, Hubert W Vliegen, Paul Steendijk, Hildo J Lamb, Albert de Roos, Ernst E van der Wall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronary angiography is considered the gold standard in evaluating vein graft disease; however, angiography does not allow assessment of hemodynamic consequences of lesions. In this study hemodynamic consequences of significant stenoses in vein grafts were evaluated by Doppler velocity assessment, and results were compared with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Angiography was performed in 58 patients after coronary artery bypass grafting because of recurrent chest pain. During the procedure, Doppler velocity measurements were acquired before and after administration of adenosine. Of 58 patients (with 78 vein grafts), 20 patients (with 24 vein grafts) underwent SPECT perfusion imaging. Grafts were divided into those with nonsignificant percent diameter stenosis (< 50%) (n = 49) and those with significant percent diameter stenosis (> or =50%) (n = 29). When a cutoff value for coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) of 1.8 was applied, modest agreement (69%, kappa = 0.25, P < .05) between CFVR and angiography was shown. Agreement between SPECT and angiography was also modest (63%, kappa = 0.28, P = not significant). SPECT and CFVR provided comparable information in 20 of 24 grafts with available SPECT, illustrating good agreement (83%, kappa = 0.61, P = .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Significant stenoses in vein grafts require further exploration to assess their hemodynamic significance. The Doppler velocity results agreed better with SPECT perfusion imaging than with percent diameter stenosis in the evaluation of vein graft function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16171714     DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2005.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  33 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Dobutamine stress myocardial perfusion imaging in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Abdou Elhendy; Jeroen J Bax; Don Poldermans
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Validation of a Doppler guide wire for intravascular measurement of coronary artery flow velocity.

Authors:  J W Doucette; P D Corl; H M Payne; A E Flynn; M Goto; M Nassi; J Segal
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Safety of deferring angioplasty in patients with normal coronary flow velocity reserve.

Authors:  M Ferrari; B Schnell; G S Werner; H R Figulla
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Validation of volumetric flow measurements by means of a Doppler-tipped coronary angioplasty guide wire.

Authors:  A J Labovitz; D M Anthonis; T L Cravens; M J Kern
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Coronary flow velocity dynamics in normal and diseased arteries.

Authors:  E O Ofili; A J Labovitz; M J Kern
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1993-05-20       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 7.  Myocardial perfusion imaging with technetium-99m sestamibi SPECT in the evaluation of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  J Maddahi; H Kiat; K F Van Train; F Prigent; J Friedman; E V Garcia; N Alazraki; E G DePuey; K Nichols; D S Berman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1990-10-16       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 8.  Clinical applications of Doppler coronary flow reserve measurements.

Authors:  C W White
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1993-05-20       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Measurement of volumetric coronary blood flow with a Doppler catheter: validation in an animal model.

Authors:  K Sudhir; V K Hargrave; E L Johnson; G Aldea; H Mori; T A Ports; P G Yock
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Value of coronary stenotic flow velocity acceleration in prediction of angiographic restenosis following balloon angioplasty.

Authors:  M Albertal; E Regar; G Van Langenhove; S G Carlier; J J Piek; B de Bruyne; C di Mario; D Foley; K Kozuma; M A Costa; P W Serruys
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  5 in total

1.  Defining the "gold standard": a changing paradigm.

Authors:  Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Diagnosis of coronary artery disease in persons with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Nima Alipour; Nathan D Wong; Shaista Malik
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 3.  Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Lesions-Old and New Kids on the Block.

Authors:  Prashant Patel; Ravi Rao; Prabhdeep Sethi; Ashis Mukherjee; Padmini Varadarajan; Ramdas G Pai
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2021-02-12

Review 4.  Diagnostic and Management Strategies in Patients with Late Recurrent Angina after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Authors:  Ruben W de Winter; Mohammed S Rahman; Pepijn A van Diemen; Stefan P Schumacher; Ruurt A Jukema; Yvemarie B O Somsen; Albert C van Rossum; Niels J Verouden; Ibrahim Danad; Ronak Delewi; Alexander Nap; Paul Knaapen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.955

5.  Comparative Analysis between SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and CT Coronary Angiography for Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Jian-Ming Li; Ting Li; Rong-Fang Shi; Li-Ren Zhang
Journal:  Int J Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-07-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.