Literature DB >> 16170242

Clinical genetics issues encountered by family physicians.

Louise S Acheson1, Kurt C Stange, Stephen Zyzanski.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the genetics-related clinical issues encountered by family physicians, and the medical problems they referred to genetics consultants.
METHODS: Questionnaires were mailed to a nationwide, random sample of 498 practicing family physicians, asking how many times in the past year they discussed genetic information about 19 familial or genetic conditions with patients and what proportion of the families with each genetic condition were referred for genetics consultation. Factor analysis was used to group the conditions.
RESULTS: The response rate was 38% (n = 190). Respondents were similar to non-respondents except that more were women. Most family physicians reported discussing the genetics of common cancers, cardiovascular disease, and Alzheimer's disease with two or more patients in the past year. Thirteen percent had referred families for genetics assessment of breast-ovarian cancer but only two made genetics referrals for cardiovascular disease or dementia. 25% to 50% of family physicians had addressed genetic issues in at least one family with hemoglobinopathy, a blood clotting disorder, hemochromatosis, mental illness, vision loss or deafness, chromosome abnormality, infertility or pregnancy loss, congenital anomalies, mental retardation, and neurofibromatosis. Most cases were not referred to geneticists. Of respondents, 23% said that genetics consultation is very difficult to obtain or unavailable and 18% listed ethical and social dilemmas related to pursuing genetic diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: Nationwide, family physicians address a variety of genetics issues with patients, most frequently consulting geneticists for perinatal conditions and familial cancers. Access to genetics consultation is more difficult in rural areas. These data may be used in organizing genetics services and in planning professional education programs for primary care clinicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16170242     DOI: 10.1097/01.gim.0000177418.24176.9b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  23 in total

1.  A comparative study of patients' perceptions of genetic and genomic medicine services in California and Malaysia.

Authors:  Emily Qian; Meow-Keong Thong; Pamela Flodman; Jay Gargus
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2018-12-03

2.  Clinician perspectives about molecular genetic testing for heritable conditions and development of a clinician-friendly laboratory report.

Authors:  Ira M Lubin; Margaret M McGovern; Zoe Gibson; Susan J Gross; Elaine Lyon; Roberta A Pagon; Victoria M Pratt; Jamila Rashid; Colleen Shaw; Lander Stoddard; Tracy L Trotter; Marc S Williams; Jean Amos Wilson; Kenneth Pass
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Factors which impact the delivery of genetic risk assessment services focused on inherited cancer genomics: expanding the role and reach of certified genetics professionals.

Authors:  Cristi Radford; Anya Prince; Karen Lewis; Tuya Pal
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone Delivery of BRCA1/2 Genetic Counseling Compared With In-Person Counseling: 1-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Anita Y Kinney; Laurie E Steffen; Barbara H Brumbach; Wendy Kohlmann; Ruofei Du; Ji-Hyun Lee; Amanda Gammon; Karin Butler; Saundra S Buys; Antoinette M Stroup; Rebecca A Campo; Kristina G Flores; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Patient Perceptions of Care as Influenced by a Large Institutional Pharmacogenomic Implementation Program.

Authors:  R P McKillip; B A Borden; P Galecki; S A Ham; L Patrick-Miller; J P Hall; S Hussain; K Danahey; M Siegler; M J Sorrentino; Y Sacro; A M Davis; D T Rubin; K Lipstreuer; T S Polonsky; R Nanda; W R Harper; J L Koyner; D L Burnet; W M Stadler; M J Ratain; D O Meltzer; P H O'Donnell
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Attitudes of genetic counselors towards genetic susceptibility testing in children.

Authors:  Rishona L Mackoff; Ellen F Iverson; Preston Kiekel; Frederick Dorey; Jeffrey S Upperman; Aida B Metzenberg
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  Genetic risk assessments in individuals at high risk for inherited breast cancer in the breast oncology care setting.

Authors:  Tuya Pal; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.302

8.  Ordering molecular genetic tests and reporting results: practices in laboratory and clinical settings.

Authors:  Ira M Lubin; Michele Caggana; Carolyn Constantin; Susan J Gross; Elaine Lyon; Roberta A Pagon; Tracy L Trotter; Jean Amos Wilson; Margaret M McGovern
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 5.568

9.  Effectiveness of an online curriculum for medical students on genetics, genetic testing and counseling.

Authors:  Mary P Metcalf; T Bradley Tanner; Amanda Buchanan
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2010-01-29

10.  Defining and measuring the patient-centered medical home.

Authors:  Kurt C Stange; Paul A Nutting; William L Miller; Carlos R Jaén; Benjamin F Crabtree; Susan A Flocke; James M Gill
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.