Literature DB >> 19197001

Clinician perspectives about molecular genetic testing for heritable conditions and development of a clinician-friendly laboratory report.

Ira M Lubin1, Margaret M McGovern, Zoe Gibson, Susan J Gross, Elaine Lyon, Roberta A Pagon, Victoria M Pratt, Jamila Rashid, Colleen Shaw, Lander Stoddard, Tracy L Trotter, Marc S Williams, Jean Amos Wilson, Kenneth Pass.   

Abstract

The use of molecular genetic tests for heritable conditions is expected to increase in medical settings, where genetic knowledge is often limited. As part of a project to improve the clarity of genetic test result reports to minimize misunderstandings that could compromise patient care, we sought input about format and content from practicing primary care clinicians. In facilitated workgroup discussions, clinicians from pediatric, obstetrics-gynecology, and family practice provided their perspectives about molecular genetic testing with a focus on the laboratory reporting of test results. Common principles for enhancing the readability and comprehension of test result reports were derived from these discussions. These principles address the presentation of patient- and test-specific information, the test result interpretation, and guidance for future steps. Model test result reports for DNA-based cystic fibrosis testing are presented that were developed based on workgroup discussions, previous studies, and professional guidelines. The format of these model test reports, which are applicable to a variety of molecular genetic tests, should be useful for communicating essential information from the laboratory to health care professionals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19197001      PMCID: PMC2665866          DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2009.080130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  28 in total

1.  Cystic fibrosis gene testing a challenge: experts say widespread use is creating unnecessary risks.

Authors:  Brian Vastag
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-06-11       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Genetic testing coverage and reimbursement: a provider's dilemma.

Authors:  L Joan Logue
Journal:  Clin Leadersh Manag Rev       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

Review 3.  Barriers to the provision of genetic services by primary care physicians: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Sandy Suther; Patricia Goodson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  Physician survey of a laboratory medicine interpretive service and evaluation of the influence of interpretations on laboratory test ordering.

Authors:  Martha E Laposata; Michael Laposata; Elizabeth M Van Cott; Dion S Buchner; Mohammed S Kashalo; Anand S Dighe
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 5.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amit X Garg; Neill K J Adhikari; Heather McDonald; M Patricia Rosas-Arellano; P J Devereaux; Joseph Beyene; Justina Sam; R Brian Haynes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Clinically relevant breast cancer reporting: using process measures to improve anatomic pathology reporting.

Authors:  E H Hammond; R L Flinner
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.534

7.  The use and interpretation of commercial APC gene testing for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  F M Giardiello; J D Brensinger; G M Petersen; M C Luce; L M Hylind; J A Bacon; S V Booker; R D Parker; S R Hamilton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-03-20       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Physicians' perceived usefulness of and satisfaction with test reports for cystic fibrosis (DeltaF508) and factor V Leiden.

Authors:  Marie Krousel-Wood; Hans C Andersson; Janet Rice; Kelly E Jackson; Eunice R Rosner; Ira M Lubin
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 9.  Genetic testing in primary care.

Authors:  Wylie Burke
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.929

10.  Ordering molecular genetic tests and reporting results: practices in laboratory and clinical settings.

Authors:  Ira M Lubin; Michele Caggana; Carolyn Constantin; Susan J Gross; Elaine Lyon; Roberta A Pagon; Tracy L Trotter; Jean Amos Wilson; Margaret M McGovern
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 5.568

View more
  15 in total

1.  Consensus: a framework for evaluation of uncertain gene variants in laboratory test reporting.

Authors:  David K Crockett; Perry G Ridge; Andrew R Wilson; Elaine Lyon; Marc S Williams; Scott P Narus; Julio C Facelli; Joyce A Mitchell
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 11.117

2.  Evaluation of LOINC for representing constitutional cytogenetic test result reports.

Authors:  Yan Z Heras; Joyce A Mitchell; Marc S Williams; Arthur R Brothman; Stanley M Huff
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2009-11-14

3.  Educating patients and providers through comprehensive pharmacogenetic test reports.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 2.533

4.  A theory-informed systematic review of clinicians' genetic testing practices.

Authors:  Jean L Paul; Hanna Leslie; Alison H Trainer; Clara Gaff
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 5.  The ins and outs of molecular pathology reporting.

Authors:  Véronique Tack; Kelly Dufraing; Zandra C Deans; Han J van Krieken; Elisabeth M C Dequeker
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-03-26       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Refining the structure and content of clinical genomic reports.

Authors:  Michael O Dorschner; Laura M Amendola; Brian H Shirts; Lesli Kiedrowski; Joseph Salama; Adam S Gordon; Stephanie M Fullerton; Peter Tarczy-Hornoch; Peter H Byers; Gail P Jarvik
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.908

7.  Genetic testing behavior and reporting patterns in electronic medical records for physicians trained in a primary care specialty or subspecialty.

Authors:  Jeremiah Geronimo Ronquillo; Cheng Li; William T Lester
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 8.  Practical challenges in integrating genomic data into the electronic health record.

Authors:  Abel N Kho; Luke V Rasmussen; John J Connolly; Peggy L Peissig; Justin Starren; Hakon Hakonarson; M Geoffrey Hayes
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 9.  Primary-care providers' perceived barriers to integration of genetics services: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Natalie A Mikat-Stevens; Ingrid A Larson; Beth A Tarini
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Electronic health record interventions at the point of care improve documentation of care processes and decrease orders for genetic tests commonly ordered by nongeneticists.

Authors:  Maren T Scheuner; Jane Peredo; Kelly Tangney; Diane Schoeff; Taylor Sale; Caroline Lubick-Goldzweig; Alison Hamilton; Lee Hilborne; Martin Lee; Brian Mittman; Elizabeth M Yano; Ira M Lubin
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.