Literature DB >> 24282336

Gender differences in the motivational processing of facial beauty.

Boaz Levy1, Dan Ariely, Nina Mazar, Won Chi, Scott Lukas, Igor Elman.   

Abstract

Gender may be involved in the motivational processing of facial beauty. This study applied a behavioral probe, known to activate brain motivational regions, to healthy heterosexual subjects. Matched samples of men and women were administered two tasks: (a) key pressing to change the viewing time of average or beautiful female or male facial images, and (b) rating the attractiveness of these images. Men expended more effort (via the key-press task) to extend the viewing time of the beautiful female faces. Women displayed similarly increased effort for beautiful male and female images, but the magnitude of this effort was substantially lower than that of men for beautiful females. Heterosexual facial attractiveness ratings were comparable in both groups. These findings demonstrate heterosexual specificity of facial motivational targets for men, but not for women. Moreover, heightened drive for the pursuit of heterosexual beauty in the face of regular valuational assessments, displayed by men, suggests a gender-specific incentive sensitization phenomenon.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Female; Heterosexual; Incentive sensitization; Male; Men; Motivation; Reinforcement; Reward; Sex; Women

Year:  2008        PMID: 24282336      PMCID: PMC3838871          DOI: 10.1016/j.lmot.2007.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Motiv        ISSN: 0023-9690


  26 in total

Review 1.  Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight.

Authors:  S E Taylor; L C Klein; B P Lewis; T L Gruenewald; R A Gurung; J A Updegraff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Beauty in a smile: the role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness.

Authors:  J O'Doherty; J Winston; H Critchley; D Perrett; D M Burt; R J Dolan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 3.  Ventral striatal control of appetitive motivation: role in ingestive behavior and reward-related learning.

Authors:  Ann E Kelley
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Probing reward function in post-traumatic stress disorder with beautiful facial images.

Authors:  Igor Elman; Dan Ariely; Nina Mazar; Itzhak Aharon; Natasha B Lasko; Michael L Macklin; Scott P Orr; Scott E Lukas; Roger K Pitman
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 3.222

5.  Neural coding of reward-prediction error signals during classical conditioning with attractive faces.

Authors:  Signe Bray; John O'Doherty
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  A neurobehavioral model of affiliative bonding: implications for conceptualizing a human trait of affiliation.

Authors:  Richard A Depue; Jeannine V Morrone-Strupinsky
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 12.579

7.  Is it possible to dissociate 'liking' and 'wanting' for foods in humans? A novel experimental procedure.

Authors:  Graham Finlayson; Neil King; John E Blundell
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2006-10-17

8.  A sex difference in features that elicit genital response.

Authors:  Meredith L Chivers; J Michael Bailey
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.251

9.  Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating.

Authors:  D M Buss; D P Schmitt
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Do pretty women inspire men to discount the future?

Authors:  Margo Wilson; Martin Daly
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Pain and suicidality: insights from reward and addiction neuroscience.

Authors:  Igor Elman; David Borsook; Nora D Volkow
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 11.685

2.  The wandering mind of men: ERP evidence for gender differences in attention bias towards attractive opposite sex faces.

Authors:  Johanna C van Hooff; Helen Crawford; Mark van Vugt
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Hot or not: response inhibition reduces the hedonic value and motivational incentive of sexual stimuli.

Authors:  Anne E Ferrey; Alexandra Frischen; Mark J Fenske
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-26

4.  The effect of cleft lip on adults' responses to faces: cross-species findings.

Authors:  Christine E Parsons; Katherine S Young; Emma Parsons; Annika Dean; Lynne Murray; Tim Goodacre; Louise Dalton; Alan Stein; Morten L Kringelbach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Gender differences in the motivational processing of babies are determined by their facial attractiveness.

Authors:  Rinah Yamamoto; Dan Ariely; Won Chi; Daniel D Langleben; Igor Elman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Age-related striatal BOLD changes without changes in behavioral loss aversion.

Authors:  Vijay Viswanathan; Sang Lee; Jodi M Gilman; Byoung Woo Kim; Nick Lee; Laura Chamberlain; Sherri L Livengood; Kalyan Raman; Myung Joo Lee; Jake Kuster; Daniel B Stern; Bobby Calder; Frank J Mulhern; Anne J Blood; Hans C Breiter
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Using eye tracking to test for individual differences in attention to attractive faces.

Authors:  Christian Valuch; Lena S Pflüger; Bernard Wallner; Bruno Laeng; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-02

8.  Aesthetic and incentive salience of cute infant faces: studies of observer sex, oral contraception and menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Reiner Sprengelmeyer; Jennifer Lewis; Amanda Hahn; David I Perrett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sex-differences of face coding: evidence from larger right hemispheric M170 in men and dipole source modelling.

Authors:  Hannes O Tiedt; Joachim E Weber; Alfred Pauls; Klaus M Beier; Andreas Lueschow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Facial beauty affects implicit and explicit learning of men and women differently.

Authors:  Eleni Ziori; Zoltán Dienes
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.