BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although attenuated coil packing of intracranial aneurysms is an important goal of endovascular embolization, because of their small size, some aneurysms can only be treated with a single embolization coil. We retrospectively analyzed small aneurysms treated with a single Guglielmi detachable coil (GDC) to determine whether the coil-embolization ratio (CER) is predictive of embolization stability. METHODS: The CER was determined for 25 small (<7-mm diameter) intracranial aneurysms, each treated with a single embolization coil. The largest aneurysm dimension, estimated by comparison to anatomic landmarks, was used for volume calculation based on a spherical model. Coil volumes were according to manufacturer specifications. CER was calculated by the formula (coil volume/aneurysm volume) x 100%. Embolization stability was assessed by angiographic follow-up. RESULTS: The average CER for all aneurysms was 8.2% (SD, 6.5%; range, 0.6%-21.1%). Twelve percent of the aneurysms had a CER >20%. Follow-up angiographic assessment was conducted at an average of 30.8 months after initial treatment. Eighty-four percent of the aneurysms were obliterated. One large (6 x 10 mm) and 3 small (<1 mm) recurrences were identified. The average CER for unchanged aneurysms was 8.0% (SD, 5.9%) and for the recurrent aneurysms was 8.8% (SD, 8.7%), which was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Small aneurysms treated with a single coil achieved satisfactory stability despite having a low average packing attenuation. CER was not predictive of recurrence in small intracranial aneurysms treated with a single detachable coil.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although attenuated coil packing of intracranial aneurysms is an important goal of endovascular embolization, because of their small size, some aneurysms can only be treated with a single embolization coil. We retrospectively analyzed small aneurysms treated with a single Guglielmi detachable coil (GDC) to determine whether the coil-embolization ratio (CER) is predictive of embolization stability. METHODS: The CER was determined for 25 small (<7-mm diameter) intracranial aneurysms, each treated with a single embolization coil. The largest aneurysm dimension, estimated by comparison to anatomic landmarks, was used for volume calculation based on a spherical model. Coil volumes were according to manufacturer specifications. CER was calculated by the formula (coil volume/aneurysm volume) x 100%. Embolization stability was assessed by angiographic follow-up. RESULTS: The average CER for all aneurysms was 8.2% (SD, 6.5%; range, 0.6%-21.1%). Twelve percent of the aneurysms had a CER >20%. Follow-up angiographic assessment was conducted at an average of 30.8 months after initial treatment. Eighty-four percent of the aneurysms were obliterated. One large (6 x 10 mm) and 3 small (<1 mm) recurrences were identified. The average CER for unchanged aneurysms was 8.0% (SD, 5.9%) and for the recurrent aneurysms was 8.8% (SD, 8.7%), which was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Small aneurysms treated with a single coil achieved satisfactory stability despite having a low average packing attenuation. CER was not predictive of recurrence in small intracranial aneurysms treated with a single detachable coil.
Authors: N Uchiyama; S Kida; M Nomura; M Hasegawa; T Yamashima; J Yamashita; O Matsui Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2001-05-15 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: David O Wiebers; J P Whisnant; J Huston; I Meissner; R D Brown; D G Piepgras; G S Forbes; K Thielen; D Nichols; W M O'Fallon; J Peacock; L Jaeger; N F Kassell; G L Kongable-Beckman; J C Torner Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-07-12 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jean Raymond; François Guilbert; Alain Weill; Stavros A Georganos; Louis Juravsky; Anick Lambert; Julie Lamoureux; Miguel Chagnon; Daniel Roy Journal: Stroke Date: 2003-05-29 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Yuichi Murayama; Yih Lin Nien; Gary Duckwiler; Y Pierre Gobin; Reza Jahan; John Frazee; Neil Martin; Fernando Viñuela Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: L Goubergrits; B Thamsen; A Berthe; J Poethke; U Kertzscher; K Affeld; C Petz; H-C Hege; H Hoch; A Spuler Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2010-05-20 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Jin Ho Hwang; Hong Gee Roh; Young Il Chun; Hyun-Seung Kang; Jin Woo Choi; Won-Jin Moon; Joon Cho; Chang Taek Moon; Young Cho Koh Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2010-06-24 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Jimmy Ghostine; Naim Khoury; Francis Cloutier; Marc Kotowski; Jean-Christophe Gentric; André L Batista; Alain Weill; Daniel Roy; Tim E Darsaut; Jean Raymond Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2016-08-16 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: Chun Sung Cho; Young Joon Kim; Jin Kyung Kim; Young Jin Kim; Sang Koo Lee; Maeng Ki Cho Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2007-06-27 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: Francis Cloutier; Naim Khoury; Jimmy Ghostine; Behzad Farzin; Marc Kotowski; Alain Weill; Daniel Roy; Jean Raymond Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2016-10-22 Impact factor: 1.610