Literature DB >> 8133666

Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

D A Nichols1, F B Meyer, D G Piepgras, P L Smith.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the techniques, reported experiences, and advantages and disadvantages associated with the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms.
DESIGN: We review the endovascular techniques used for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms and the sequelae of subarachnoid hemorrhage, which have evolved during the past 10 years.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two broad categories of endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms are described: occlusion of the parent artery and preservation of the parent artery by selective occlusion of the aneurysm with balloons or metallic coils. The Mayo protocol for testing tolerance of patients before permanent balloon occlusion of the parent artery is described, as are the types of aneurysms most amenable to this treatment. In addition, use of balloon angioplasty for cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage is reviewed.
RESULTS: Recent improvements in microcatheter technology have facilitated the safe navigation of percutaneously introduced catheters in the intracranial circulation and selective catheterization of intracranial aneurysms. Surgically difficult aneurysms are now being treated with endovascular techniques more frequently than in the past. Early results from animal experiments and human trials have shown that selective occlusion of aneurysms with metallic coils may have a role in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Balloon angioplasty of symptomatic cerebral vasospasm has demonstrated improvement in neurologic function in approximately 70% of patients.
CONCLUSION: As technology continues to improve and as greater experience is obtained, interventional neuroradiologists will continue to have an increasingly important role in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8133666     DOI: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)61068-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  6 in total

1.  Absent relationship between the coil-embolization ratio in small aneurysms treated with a single detachable coil and outcomes.

Authors:  James K Goddard; Christopher J Moran; DeWitte T Cross; Colin P Derdeyn
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Balloon-assisted coil embolization of wide-necked aneurysms of the internal carotid artery: medium-term angiographic and clinical follow-up in 22 patients.

Authors:  P K Nelson; D I Levy
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Utility of balloon-assisted Guglielmi detachable coiling in the treatment of 49 cerebral aneurysms: a retrospective, multicenter study.

Authors:  J P Cottier; A Pasco; S Gallas; J Gabrillargues; C Cognard; J Drouineau; L Brunereau; D Herbreteau
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Coil occlusion of the parent artery for treatment of symptomatic peripheral intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  D A Eckard; P L O'Boynick; C M McPherson; V R Eckard; P Han; P Arnold; S Batnitzky
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Thromboembolic events associated with balloon-assisted coil embolization: evaluation with diffusion-weighted MR imaging.

Authors:  Sait Albayram; Hakan Selcuk; Batuhan Kara; Erhan Bozdag; Omer Uzma; Naci Kocer; Civan Islak
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Guglielmi detachable coil treatment of ruptured saccular cerebral aneurysms: retrospective review of a 10-year single-center experience.

Authors:  Jonathan A Friedman; Douglas A Nichols; Fredric B Meyer; Mark A Pichelmann; Jon I McIver; L Gerard Toussaint; Patsy L Axley; Robert D Brown
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.825

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.