Jimmy Ghostine1, Naim Khoury1, Francis Cloutier1, Marc Kotowski1, Jean-Christophe Gentric1, André L Batista1, Alain Weill1, Daniel Roy1, Tim E Darsaut2, Jean Raymond3. 1. Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Notre-Dame Hospital, Department of Radiology, Service of Neuroradiology, Canada. 2. University of Alberta Hospital, Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, Canada. 3. Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Notre-Dame Hospital, Department of Radiology, Service of Neuroradiology, Canada jean.raymond@umontreal.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Endovascular coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms is an effective treatment for the prevention of aneurysm rebleeding after subarachnoid hemorrhage. It is also often used in unruptured aneurysms, but it is associated with aneurysm remnants and recurrences in up to 20%-33% of patients. We hypothesized that better aneurysm occlusion rates can be achieved with coils of larger caliber. METHODS: The Does Embolization with Larger coils lead to better Treatment of Aneurysms (DELTA) trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. To test the hypothesis that 15-caliber coiling systems are superior to 10-caliber coils, 564 patients with aneurysms measuring 4-12 mm will be randomized 1:1 to embolization with either 10-caliber coils exclusively (control group) or the highest safely achievable proportion of 15-caliber coils (intervention group). The primary efficacy endpoint of the trial is the occurrence of a major recurrence or a residual aneurysm at one year. A pilot phase of 165 patients will be conducted to verify feasibility of the coiling strategy, compliance to treatment allocation, safety of a 15-caliber platinum coil embolization strategy, recruitment rates, and the capacity to improve packing density. DISCUSSION: The DELTA trial will test the hypothesis that the use of coils of larger caliber can improve angiographic results of endovascular coiling.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Endovascular coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms is an effective treatment for the prevention of aneurysm rebleeding after subarachnoid hemorrhage. It is also often used in unruptured aneurysms, but it is associated with aneurysm remnants and recurrences in up to 20%-33% of patients. We hypothesized that better aneurysm occlusion rates can be achieved with coils of larger caliber. METHODS: The Does Embolization with Larger coils lead to better Treatment of Aneurysms (DELTA) trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. To test the hypothesis that 15-caliber coiling systems are superior to 10-caliber coils, 564 patients with aneurysms measuring 4-12 mm will be randomized 1:1 to embolization with either 10-caliber coils exclusively (control group) or the highest safely achievable proportion of 15-caliber coils (intervention group). The primary efficacy endpoint of the trial is the occurrence of a major recurrence or a residual aneurysm at one year. A pilot phase of 165 patients will be conducted to verify feasibility of the coiling strategy, compliance to treatment allocation, safety of a 15-caliber platinum coil embolization strategy, recruitment rates, and the capacity to improve packing density. DISCUSSION: The DELTA trial will test the hypothesis that the use of coils of larger caliber can improve angiographic results of endovascular coiling.
Authors: J Raymond; P White; D F Kallmes; J Spears; T Marotta; D Roy; F Guilbert; A Weill; T Nguyen; A J Molyneux; H Cloft; S Cekirge; I Saatci; S Bracard; J F Meder; J Moret; C Cognard; A I Qureshi; A S Turk; A Berenstein Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2008-06-30 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: M Piotin; S Mandai; K J Murphy; K Sugiu; P Gailloud; J B Martin; D A Rüfenacht Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Justin R Mascitelli; Eric K Oermann; Reade A De Leacy; Henry Moyle; J Mocco; Aman B Patel Journal: J Clin Neurosci Date: 2015-05-16 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Michel Piotin; Laurent Spelle; Charbel Mounayer; Marco T Salles-Rezende; Daniel Giansante-Abud; Ricardo Vanzin-Santos; Jacques Moret Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-02-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: N Uchiyama; S Kida; M Nomura; M Hasegawa; T Yamashima; J Yamashita; O Matsui Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2001-05-15 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: Nohra Chalouhi; Aaron S Dumont; David Hasan; Stavropoula Tjoumakaris; L Fernando Gonzalez; Robert M Starke; Richard Dalyai; Sedeek El Moursi; Robert Rosenwasser; Pascal Jabbour Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Andrew J Molyneux; Richard S C Kerr; Ly-Mee Yu; Mike Clarke; Mary Sneade; Julia A Yarnold; Peter Sandercock Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Sep 3-9 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Paweł Brzegowy; Iwona Kucybała; Kamil Krupa; Bartłomiej Łasocha; Aleksander Wilk; Paweł Latacz; Andrzej Urbanik; Tadeusz J Popiela Journal: Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Date: 2019-01-21 Impact factor: 1.195