Literature DB >> 16136512

Is mitotic chromatid segregation random?

C D Bell1.   

Abstract

The question of whether mitotic segregation of chromatids is random or programmed assumes great significance for cellular differentiation if one recognizes that sister chromatids may have epigenetic differences and carry them from one generation into the next. The literature was examined for evidence of non-random chromosomal and chromatid segregation. Many organisms were described as undergoing non-random homologue segregation in meiosis I. The explanations for these phenomena were attributed in some instances, to peculiarities of the meiotic spindle, though in some convincing experiments, the epigenetic heterochromatin of the kinetochores was implicated. The few existing descriptions of non-random mitotic segregation were also described. Existing literature on ultrastructural, immunohistochemical, and physiological features of the chromatid kinetochores during the mitotic process was searched for evidence of asymmetry or structural differences between sister chromatids, which is presented. Also reported are descriptions of how epigenetic changes and cell differentiation can influence centromeric function and ultimately, kinetochore function. Fundamental to the hypothesis of gene regulation presented here, is the assumption that genetic foci on different chromosomes interact, and must be proximate to each other and stereologically compatible for interactions to occur. Also described are spatial changes in chromosomal territories associated with function and differentiation. These territories can be in varying nuclear locations depending on gene function, and may show asymmetry between daughter cells. Despite evidence presented for the possibility of non-random chromatid segregation at mitosis, this question will remain unanswered until the matter is specifically addressed by experiment.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16136512     DOI: 10.14670/HH-20.1313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histol Histopathol        ISSN: 0213-3911            Impact factor:   2.303


  7 in total

Review 1.  Biased segregation of DNA and centrosomes: moving together or drifting apart?

Authors:  Shahragim Tajbakhsh; Cayetano Gonzalez
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Identification of sister chromatids by DNA template strand sequences.

Authors:  Ester Falconer; Elizabeth A Chavez; Alexander Henderson; Steven S S Poon; Steven McKinney; Lindsay Brown; David G Huntsman; Peter M Lansdorp
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Epigenetic differences between sister chromatids?

Authors:  Peter M Lansdorp; Ester Falconer; Jiang Tao; Julie Brind'Amour; Ulrike Naumann
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Kinetochore asymmetry defines a single yeast lineage.

Authors:  Peter H Thorpe; Joanne Bruno; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Strand-seq: a unifying tool for studies of chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Ester Falconer; Peter M Lansdorp
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 7.727

6.  A genome-wide library of MADM mice for single-cell genetic mosaic analysis.

Authors:  Ximena Contreras; Nicole Amberg; Amarbayasgalan Davaatseren; Andi H Hansen; Johanna Sonntag; Lill Andersen; Tina Bernthaler; Carmen Streicher; Anna Heger; Randy L Johnson; Lindsay A Schwarz; Liqun Luo; Thomas Rülicke; Simon Hippenmeyer
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 9.423

7.  Karyotype features of trematode Himasthla elongata.

Authors:  Anna I Solovyeva; Vera N Stefanova; Olga I Podgornaya; Serghei Iu Demin
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.009

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.