Literature DB >> 16135855

Time for a shift in focus in schizophrenia: from narrow phenotypes to broad endophenotypes.

Mark Weiser, Jim van Os, Michael Davidson.   

Abstract

Many manifestations of mental illness, risk factors, course and even response to treatment are shared by several diagnostic groups. For example, cognitive and social impairments are present to some degree in most DSM and ICD diagnostic groups. The idea that diagnostic boundaries of mental illness, including schizophrenia, have to be redefined is reinforced by recent findings indicating that on the one hand multiple genetic factors, each exerting a small effect, come together to manifest as schizophrenia, and on the other hand, depending on interaction with the environment, the same genetic variations can present as diverse clinical phenotypes. Rather than attempting to find a unitary biological explanation for a DSM construct of schizophrenia, it would be reasonable to deconstruct it into the most basic manifestations, some of which are common with other DSM constructs, such as cognitive or social impairment, and then investigate the biological substrate of these manifestations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16135855     DOI: 10.1192/bjp.187.3.203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0007-1250            Impact factor:   9.319


  18 in total

1.  Predictors of psychosis: a 50-year follow-up of the Lundby population.

Authors:  Mats Bogren; Cecilia Mattisson; Kristian Tambs; Vibeke Horstmann; Povl Munk-Jørgensen; Per Nettelbladt
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 2.  Comprehensive neurocognitive endophenotyping strategies for mouse models of genetic disorders.

Authors:  Michael R Hunsaker
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 11.685

3.  Does Schizophrenia Exist?

Authors:  D S Goel
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

Review 4.  Cannabis and cognitive dysfunction: parallels with endophenotypes of schizophrenia?

Authors:  Nadia Solowij; Patricia T Michie
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.186

5.  Evidence that psychotic symptoms are prevalent in disorders of anxiety and depression, impacting on illness onset, risk, and severity--implications for diagnosis and ultra-high risk research.

Authors:  Johanna T W Wigman; Martine van Nierop; Wilma A M Vollebergh; Roselind Lieb; Katja Beesdo-Baum; Hans-Ullrich Wittchen; Jim van Os
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 6.  Deconstructing schizophrenia: an overview of the use of endophenotypes in order to understand a complex disorder.

Authors:  David L Braff; Robert Freedman; Nicholas J Schork; Irving I Gottesman
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2006-11-06       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 7.  Affective traits in schizophrenia and schizotypy.

Authors:  William P Horan; Jack J Blanchard; Lee Anna Clark; Michael F Green
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 9.306

8.  Local gyrification index in probands with psychotic disorders and their first-degree relatives.

Authors:  Pranav Nanda; Neeraj Tandon; Ian T Mathew; Christoforos I Giakoumatos; Hulegar A Abhishekh; Brett A Clementz; Godfrey D Pearlson; John Sweeney; Carol A Tamminga; Matcheri S Keshavan
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 9.  The social defeat hypothesis of schizophrenia: an update.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Selten; Elsje van der Ven; Bart P F Rutten; Elizabeth Cantor-Graae
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 9.306

10.  Analyzing gene expression data in mice with the Neuro Behavior Ontology.

Authors:  Robert Hoehndorf; John M Hancock; Nigel W Hardy; Ann-Marie Mallon; Paul N Schofield; Georgios V Gkoutos
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.957

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.