Literature DB >> 27889861

Synchronized navigation of current and prior studies using image registration improves radiologist's efficiency.

Daniel Forsberg1,2, Amit Gupta3, Christopher Mills3, Brett MacAdam3, Beverly Rosipko3, Barbara A Bangert3, Michael D Coffey3, Christos Kosmas3, Jeffrey L Sunshine3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate how the use of multi-modal rigid image registration integrated within a standard picture archiving and communication system affects the efficiency of a radiologist while performing routine interpretations of cases including prior examinations.
METHODS: Six radiologists were recruited to read a set of cases (either 16 neuroradiology or 14 musculoskeletal cases) during two crossover reading sessions. Each radiologist read each case twice, one time with synchronized navigation, which enables spatial synchronization across examinations from different study dates, and one time without. Efficiency was evaluated based upon time to read a case and amount of scrolling while browsing a case using Wilcoxon signed rank test.
RESULTS: Significant improvements in efficiency were found considering either all radiologists simultaneously, the two sections separately and the majority of individual radiologists for time to read and for amount of scrolling. The relative improvement for each individual radiologist ranged from 4 to 32% for time to read and from 14 to 38% for amount of scrolling.
CONCLUSION: Image registration providing synchronized navigation across examinations from different study dates provides a tool that enables radiologists to work more efficiently while reading cases with one or more prior examinations.

Keywords:  Efficiency; Image registration; PACS; Synchronized navigation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27889861     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-016-1506-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  19 in total

1.  Must new radiographs be compared with all previous radiographs, or only with the most recently obtained radiographs?

Authors:  L Berlin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  A survey of medical image registration.

Authors:  J B Maintz; M A Viergever
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Performance evaluation of an automated system for registration and postprocessing of CT scans.

Authors:  N M Alpert; D Berdichevsky; Z Levin; V Thangaraj; G Gonzalez; M H Lev
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Automatic detection and segmentation of evolving processes in 3D medical images: Application to multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  David Rey; Gérard Subsol; Hervé Delingette; Nicholas Ayache
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  Development and validation of queries using structured query language (SQL) to determine the utilization of comparison imaging in radiology reports stored on PACS.

Authors:  Paras Lakhani; Elliot D Menschik; Alberto F Goldszal; Joseph P Murray; Mark G Weiner; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 6.  A review of geometric transformations for nonrigid body registration.

Authors:  M Holden
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 7.  Deformable medical image registration: a survey.

Authors:  Aristeidis Sotiras; Christos Davatzikos; Nikos Paragios
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Volumetric growth rate of stage I lung cancer prior to treatment: serial CT scanning.

Authors:  Helen T Winer-Muram; S Gregory Jennings; Robert D Tarver; Alex M Aisen; Mark Tann; Dewey J Conces; Cristopher A Meyer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Differential value of comparison with previous examinations in diagnostic versus screening mammography.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Edward A Sickles; Rita E Sohlich; Katherine E Dee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Image registration improves confidence and accuracy of image interpretation.

Authors:  Bradley J Erickson; Julia Patriarche; Christopher Wood; Norbert Campeau; E Paul Lindell; Vladimir Savcenko; Norman Arslanlar; Liqin Wang
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2007-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.