Literature DB >> 16125496

Radiographic left ventricular-right ventricular interlead distance predicts the acute hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

E Kevin Heist1, Dali Fan, Theofanie Mela, Daniel Arzola-Castaner, Vivek Y Reddy, Moussa Mansour, Michael H Picard, Jeremy N Ruskin, Jagmeet P Singh.   

Abstract

Placement of left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) leads with maximal interlead separation is frequently sought during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), but few published data are available to support this. This study examined the relation between LV and RV lead separation and the acute effects of CRT on cardiac contractility. A total of 51 consecutive patients who underwent CRT for standard indications with sufficient mitral regurgitation for echocardiographic assessment of contractility (using Doppler profiles of mitral regurgitation as a percentage of change in dP/dt [DeltadP/dt] with CRT on and off), successful transvenous LV lead placement, and postprocedural chest radiography were evaluated. The separation of the LV and RV lead tips (direct interlead distance and horizontal and vertical components) was determined on postprocedural posteroanterior and lateral radiographs. The corrected direct LV-RV interlead distance on the lateral radiograph was correlated with the DeltadP/dt (n = 51, r = 0.43, p = 0.002). The lateral interlead distance in the horizontal plane (r = 0.58, p <0.0001), but not the vertical plane (r = -0.28, p = NS), correlated with the DeltadP/dt. The corrected horizontal interlead distance on the lateral film was greater in acute hemodynamic responders to CRT (DeltadP/dt >25%) compared with nonresponders (14.4 +/- 5.4 vs 9.2 +/- 5.8 cm, p = 0.002). Other LV-RV measures on the posteroanterior and lateral radiographs did not correlate with the DeltadP/dt. Use of these findings may help to guide the sites of LV and RV lead placement to maximize the benefit derived from CRT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16125496     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.04.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  15 in total

Review 1.  Lead positioning strategies to enhance response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Dan Blendea; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Periprocedural management of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  John Rickard; Niraj Varma
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-04

Review 3.  How to improve outcomes with cardiac resynchronisation therapy: importance of lead positioning.

Authors:  Peter J Cowburn; Christophe Leclercq
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy: the MGH experience.

Authors:  Jagmeet P Singh; Jeremy N Ruskin
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 5.  "Dialing-in" cardiac resynchronization therapy: overcoming constraints of the coronary venous anatomy.

Authors:  Jagmeet P Singh; E Kevin Heist; Jeremy N Ruskin; J Warren Harthorne
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Initial Japanese experience and long-term follow-up with a new active fixation coronary sinus lead, the StarFix 4195.

Authors:  Takayuki Nagai; Hideki Okayama; Kazuhisa Nishimura; Katsuji Inoue; Jun Suzuki; Akiyoshi Ogimoto; Tomoaki Ohtsuka; Go Hiasa; Takumi Sumimoto; Funada Jun-Ichi; Jitsuo Higaki
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2010-01-27

7.  Ventricular pacing site separation by cardiac computed tomography: validation for the prediction of clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  S Modi; Raymond Yee; David Scholl; John Stirrat; Jorge A Wong; Carmen Lydell; Vamshi Kotha; Lorne J Gula; Allan C Skanes; Peter Leong-Sit; David McCarty; Maria Drangova; James A White
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Clinical, laboratory, and pacing predictors of CRT response.

Authors:  Jagdesh Kandala; Robert K Altman; Mi Young Park; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Complex cardiac pacing in the setting of a district general hospital: procedural success and complications.

Authors:  Hazim Rahbi; Mohammed El-Din; Mohammad Salloum; Naeem Shaukat; Mohsin Farooq
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2014-06-24

10.  A novel fluoroscopic method of measuring right-to-left interlead distance as a predictor of reverse left ventricular remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Gregorio Covino; Mario Volpicelli; Pietro Belli; Gennaro Ratti; Paolo Tammaro; Ciro Provvisiero; Carmine Ciardiello; Luca Auricchio; Ciro Fiorentino; Paolo Capogrosso
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.