Literature DB >> 21184174

Lead positioning strategies to enhance response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Dan Blendea1, Jagmeet P Singh.   

Abstract

Left ventricular lead position is one of the main determinants of CRT response. There are several approaches in LV lead positioning that include favoring an optimal anatomical position or targeting either the segment with maximal mechanical dyssynchrony or a region with maximal electrical delay. The conventional LV lead implantation faces several technical difficulties that may prevent the obtaining of a stable position and good performance of the LV lead without phrenic nerve stimulation. In addition, implant of the LV pacing lead in areas with myocardial scar may result in less than optimal cardiac resynchronization. Several strategies have been proposed to overcome all these obstacles including multimodality cardiac imaging to help in preprocedural or intraprocedural identification of the latest activated areas of the LV and the potential anatomical constraints. In selected patients, the surgical implant may be a solution to overcome these constraints. In the future, LV endocardial or epicardial multisite pacing may deliver an enhanced response to CRT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21184174     DOI: 10.1007/s10741-010-9212-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Fail Rev        ISSN: 1382-4147            Impact factor:   4.214


  72 in total

1.  Traversing and dilating venous collaterals: a useful adjunct in left ventricular electrode placement.

Authors:  Richard P Abben; Gary Chaisson; Vinod Nair
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.022

2.  Impact of segmental left ventricle lead position on cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes.

Authors:  Faisal M Merchant; E Kevin Heist; David McCarty; Prabhat Kumar; Saumya Das; Dan Blendea; Patrick T Ellinor; Theofanie Mela; Michael H Picard; Jeremy N Ruskin; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 6.343

3.  Impact of viability and scar tissue on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in ischaemic heart failure patients.

Authors:  Claudia Ypenburg; Martin J Schalij; Gabe B Bleeker; Paul Steendijk; Eric Boersma; Petra Dibbets-Schneider; Marcel P M Stokkel; Ernst E van der Wall; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Electrocardiographic imaging of cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure: observation of variable electrophysiologic responses.

Authors:  Ping Jia; Charulatha Ramanathan; Raja N Ghanem; Kyungmoo Ryu; Niraj Varma; Yoram Rudy
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  Radiographic left ventricular-right ventricular interlead distance predicts the acute hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  E Kevin Heist; Dali Fan; Theofanie Mela; Daniel Arzola-Castaner; Vivek Y Reddy; Moussa Mansour; Michael H Picard; Jeremy N Ruskin; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Surgical epicardial left ventricular lead versus coronary sinus lead placement in biventricular pacing.

Authors:  Helmut Mair; Joerg Sachweh; Bart Meuris; Georg Nollert; Michael Schmoeckel; Albert Schuetz; Bruno Reichart; Sabine Daebritz
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Electrocardiographic imaging of patients with heart failure with left bundle branch block and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Niraj Varma; Ping Jia; Yoram Rudy
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.438

Review 8.  The venous drainage of the human myocardium.

Authors:  M von Lüdinghausen
Journal:  Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.231

9.  Minimally invasive surgical implantation of left ventricular epicardial leads for ventricular resynchronization using video-assisted thoracoscopy.

Authors:  Angel L Fernández; José B García-Bengochea; Ramiro Ledo; Marino Vega; Antonio Amaro; Julián Alvarez; José Rubio; Juan Sierra; Daniel Sánchez
Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.753

10.  Systolic improvement and mechanical resynchronization does not require electrical synchrony in the dilated failing heart with left bundle-branch block.

Authors:  Christophe Leclercq; Owen Faris; Richard Tunin; Jennifer Johnson; Ritsuchi Kato; Frank Evans; Julio Spinelli; Henry Halperin; Elliot McVeigh; David A Kass
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  6 in total

1.  Periprocedural management of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  John Rickard; Niraj Varma
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-04

2.  [Technical innovations and limitation in cardiac electrotherapy].

Authors:  H-H Minden
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2011-03

Review 3.  Newer applications of nuclear cardiology in systolic heart failure: detecting coronary artery disease and guiding device therapy.

Authors:  Mati Friehling; Prem Soman
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2011-06

Review 4.  Coronary venous system in cardiac computer tomography: Visualization, classification and role.

Authors:  Rafal Mlynarski; Agnieszka Mlynarska; Maciej Sosnowski
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-28

5.  Long-term performance of modern coronary sinus leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Jan Steffel; Anja Hurlimann; Christoph Starck; Nazmi Krasniqi; Susann Schmidt; Thomas F Luscher; Firat Duru; Frank Ruschitzka; Johannes Holzmeister; David Hurlimann
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2014-05-25

Review 6.  Indications for permanent pacing in dogs and cats.

Authors:  R A Santilli; F Giacomazzi; D M Porteiro Vázquez; M Perego
Journal:  J Vet Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 1.701

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.