Literature DB >> 16117775

Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis.

Cynthia S Petrie1, John L Williams.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to analyze and compare systematically the relative and interactive effects of implant diameter, length, and taper on calculated crestal bone strains.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three-dimensional finite-element models were created of a 20-mm premolar section of the mandible with a single endosseous implant embedded in high- or low-density cancellous bone. Oblique (200-N vertical and 40-N horizontal) occlusal loading was applied. Cortical and cancellous bone were modeled as transversely isotropic and linearly elastic. Perfect bonding was assumed at all interfaces. A two-level factorial statistical design was used to determine the main and interactive effects of four implant design variables on maximum shear strains in the crestal alveolar bone: diameter, length of tapered segment, length of untapered segment, and taper. Implant diameter ranged from 3.5 to 6 mm, total implant length from 5.75 to 23.5 mm, and taper from 0 to 14 degrees , resulting in 16 implant designs.
RESULTS: Increasing implant diameter resulted in as much as a 3.5-fold reduction in crestal strain, increasing length caused as much as a 1.65-fold reduction, whereas taper increased crestal strain, especially in narrow and short implants, where it increased 1.65-fold. Diameter, length, and taper have to be considered together because of their interactive effects on crestal bone strain.
CONCLUSION: If the objective is to minimize peri-implant strain in the crestal alveolar bone, a wide and relatively long, untapered implant appears to be the most favorable choice. Narrow, short implants with taper in the crestal region should be avoided, especially in low-density bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16117775     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01132.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  31 in total

1.  A retrospective study of implant-abutment connections on crestal bone level.

Authors:  M-I Lin; Y-W Shen; H-L Huang; J-T Hsu; L-J Fuh
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Photoelastic stress analysis in prosthetic implants of different diameters: mini, narrow, standard or wide.

Authors:  Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Alves Aldiéris Pesqueira; Daniela Micheline Dos Santos; Marcela Filié Haddad; Amália Moreno
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-09-20

3.  Influence of implant number, length, and tilting degree on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: a finite element study.

Authors:  Zeynep Gümrükçü; Yavuz Tolga Korkmaz
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Evaluation of the stress distribution in CFR-PEEK dental implants by the three-dimensional finite element method.

Authors:  João Rodrigo Sarot; Cintia Mussi Milani Contar; Ariadne Cristiane Cabral da Cruz; Ricardo de Souza Magini
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Analysis of micromovements and peri-implant stresses and strains around ultra-short implants - A three-dimensional finite-element method study.

Authors:  Nida Sumra; Shrikar Desai; Rohit Kulshrestha; Khusbhu Mishra; Raahat Vikram Singh; Prachi Gaonkar
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2021-07-01

6.  Evaluation of Micromovements and Stresses around Single Wide-Diameter and Double Implants for Replacing Mandibular Molar: A Three-Dimensional FEA.

Authors:  Shrikar R Desai; I Karthikeyan; Rika Singh
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2012-03-07

7.  Evaluation of stress distributions in peri-implant and periodontal bone tissues in 3- and 5-unit tooth and implant-supported fixed zirconia restorations by finite elements analysis.

Authors:  Sedat Guven; Koksal Beydemir; Serkan Dundar; Veysel Eratilla
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

8.  Finite Element Analysis of Dental Implants with Zirconia Crown Restorations: Conventional Cement-Retained vs. Cementless Screw-Retained.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Lee; Ho Yeol Jang; Su Young Lee
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Measurement of primary and secondary stability of dental implants by resonance frequency analysis method in mandible.

Authors:  Mehran Shokri; Arash Daraeighadikolaei
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2013-05-13

10.  Comparative evaluation of osseointegrated dental implants based on platform-switching concept: influence of diameter, length, thread shape, and in-bone positioning depth on stress-based performance.

Authors:  Luigi Baggi; Michele Di Girolamo; Giuseppe Vairo; Gianpaolo Sannino
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.