Literature DB >> 28840411

Long-term durability of orthodontic mini-implants.

Mona Aly Abbassy1,2, Ahmed Samir Bakry3,4, Khalid Hashim Zawawi5, Ali Habib Hassan5.   

Abstract

The current study aimed at examining surface and chemical composition changes of retrieved mini-implants after different periods of service as aids of anchorage for orthodontic patients. This study examined 72 retrieved orthodontic self-tapping and self-drilling mini-implants, 1.7 mm in diameter and 8 mm in length (OrthoEasy system, Forestadent, Pforzheim, Germany) from 36 adult orthodontic patients (18 men and 18 women, mean age = 23 years). The retrieved mini-implants were divided into 3 groups according to service period: 3-6 months (3M-6M) group, 6-12 months (6M-12M) group, and 12-24 months (12M-24M) group, with 24 mini-implants in each group. The control group (As Received) comprised of 24 unused mini-implants of the same type (AR group). All mini-implant heads and threaded bodies were examined for chemical characterization and topographical features by SEM-EDS. The average weight percentages for the following elements Ti, Al, and O2 were obtained and compared among the 4 groups. There was significant decrease in titanium content and deterioration for the surface properties for all parts of the mini-implants after being used inside patients' oral cavities for more than 6 months p < 0.05. The period of mini-implant service inside patients' oral cavities should not exceed 6 months.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mini-implants; Oral-care products; Orthodontics; SEM-EDS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28840411     DOI: 10.1007/s10266-017-0319-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Odontology        ISSN: 1618-1247            Impact factor:   2.634


  39 in total

1.  In vitro corrosion behaviour and osteoblast response of thermally oxidised Ti6Al4V alloy.

Authors:  M C García-Alonso; L Saldaña; G Vallés; J L González-Carrasco; J González-Cabrero; M E Martínez; E Gil-Garay; L Munuera
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Intrusion of posterior teeth using mini-screw implants.

Authors:  Young-Chel Park; Seung-Yeon Lee; Doo-Hyung Kim; Sung-Hoon Jee
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Load-related implant reaction of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.

Authors:  André Büchter; Dirk Wiechmann; Stefan Koerdt; Hans Peter Wiesmann; Josef Piffko; Ulrich Meyer
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Characterization of retrieved orthodontic miniscrew implants.

Authors:  Theodore Eliades; Spiros Zinelis; Moschos A Papadopoulos; George Eliades
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Corrosion resistance characteristics of a Ti-6Al-4V alloy scaffold that is fabricated by electron beam melting and selective laser melting for implantation in vivo.

Authors:  Bingjing Zhao; Hong Wang; Ning Qiao; Chao Wang; Min Hu
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 7.328

6.  Dissemination of wear particles to the liver, spleen, and abdominal lymph nodes of patients with hip or knee replacement.

Authors:  R M Urban; J J Jacobs; M J Tomlinson; J Gavrilovic; J Black; M Peoc'h
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  Metal release from dental biomaterials.

Authors:  D Brune
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Titanium deposition in regional lymph nodes after insertion of titanium screw implants in maxillofacial region.

Authors:  D Weingart; S Steinemann; W Schilli; J R Strub; U Hellerich; J Assenmacher; J Simpson
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.789

9.  Pharmacokinetics of vanadium in humans after intravenous administration of a vanadium containing albumin solution.

Authors:  Günter Heinemann; Burckhard Fichtl; Wolfgang Vogt
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Acceptance of orthodontic miniscrews as temporary anchorage devices.

Authors:  Khalid H Zawawi
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.711

View more
  1 in total

1.  Anatomical consideration for optimal position of orthodontic miniscrews in the maxilla: a CBCT appraisal.

Authors:  Maha S Al Amri; Hanadi M Sabban; Doaa H Alsaggaf; Fahad F Alsulaimani; Ghassan A Al-Turki; Mohammad S Al-Zahrani; Khalid H Zawawi
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 1.526

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.