Literature DB >> 1611570

Women and breast cancer: is it really possible for the public to be well informed?

C J Baines.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1992        PMID： 1611570      PMCID： PMC1492258     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN： 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Report on a Workshop of the UICC Project on Evaluation of Screening for Cancer.

Authors:  A B Miller; J Chamberlain; N E Day; M Hakama; P C Prorok
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1990-11-15       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Low-cost mass screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  E A Sickles
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Is the supply of mammography machines outstripping need and demand? An economic analysis.

Authors:  M L Brown; L G Kessler; F G Rueter
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-10-01       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Mobile breast screening: factors affecting uptake, efforts to increase response and acceptability.

Authors:  D C Haiart; L McKenzie; J Henderson; W Pollock; D V McQueen; M M Roberts; A P Forrest
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.427

5.  A pilot study of attendance for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  A Eardley; A Elkind
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Comparison of participants and nonparticipants in a work site cancer awareness and screening program.

Authors:  E A Laville; S W Vernon; G L Jackson; J I Hughes
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1989-03

7.  Demographic, clinical, and financial factors relating to the completion rate of screening mammography.

Authors:  R A Johnson; P J Murata
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  1988
  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  How risks of breast cancer and benefits of screening are communicated to women: analysis of 58 pamphlets.

Authors:  E K Slaytor; J E Ward
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-07-25

Review 2.  Prevention. How much harm? How much benefit? 4. The ethics of informed consent for preventive screening programs.

Authors:  K G Marshall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Misconceptions about efficacy of mammography screening: a public health dilemma.

Authors:  E Chamot; T V Perneger
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Physician-patient discussions of controversial cancer screening tests.

Authors:  A S Dunn; K V Shridharani; W Lou; J Bernstein; C R Horowitz
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.043
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.