Literature DB >> 2382005

Mobile breast screening: factors affecting uptake, efforts to increase response and acceptability.

D C Haiart1, L McKenzie, J Henderson, W Pollock, D V McQueen, M M Roberts, A P Forrest.   

Abstract

In 1986, a breast screening project was set up to assess the feasibility of mobile breast screening in rural areas near Edinburgh. Secondary objectives included a study of factors affecting uptake, ways in which uptake might be encouraged and a study of the acceptability of this form of screening. This paper deals with the results of studies dealing with secondary objectives. We found that response rates to opportunistic screening was poor, 5,631 attenders out of 23,229 eligible women (24.2%). This was especially so in older women. Distance proved to be the single most significant factor affecting uptake, but car and house ownership were also highly significantly correlated with response. Leaflet drops had no demonstrable effect on response, but personal invitation by general practitioners produced a 75% response rate in women 50-64 who had failed to attend on the van's previous visit. Attenders found this form of screening both convenient and acceptable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2382005     DOI: 10.1016/s0033-3506(05)80472-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health        ISSN: 0033-3506            Impact factor:   2.427


  7 in total

Review 1.  Volume of clinical activity in hospitals and healthcare outcomes, costs, and patient access.

Authors:  A Sowden; V Aletras; M Place; N Rice; A Eastwood; R Grilli; B Ferguson; J Posnett; T Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1997-06

2.  Women and breast cancer: is it really possible for the public to be well informed?

Authors:  C J Baines
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Socioeconomic deprivation, travel distance, location of service, and uptake of breast cancer screening in North Derbyshire, UK.

Authors:  Ravi Maheswaran; Tim Pearson; Hannah Jordan; David Black
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Recruitment activities and sociodemographic factors that predict attendance at a mammographic screening program.

Authors:  S F Hurley; R M Huggins; D J Jolley; D Reading
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Are caregiving responsibilities associated with non-attendance at breast screening?

Authors:  Heather Kinnear; Sheelah Connolly; Michael Rosato; Clare Hall; Adrian Mairs; Dermot O'Reilly
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Identifying geographic disparities in the early detection of breast cancer using a geographic information system.

Authors:  Jane A McElroy; Patrick L Remington; Ronald E Gangnon; Luxme Hariharan; LeAnn D Andersen
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  Psychological predictors of attendance at annual breast screening examinations.

Authors:  M V Burton; R Warren; D Price; H Earl
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.