Literature DB >> 2393209

Is the supply of mammography machines outstripping need and demand? An economic analysis.

M L Brown1, L G Kessler, F G Rueter.   

Abstract

The number of dedicated mammography machines installed in the United States has grown explosively. It is estimated that almost 10,000 machines will be installed by 1990, whereas the projected demand for screening mammography will require only approximately 2,600 machines, if the machines are used in a moderately efficient manner. The excess supply of mammography resources raises concern from an economic perspective for several reasons. First, such a condition means that health care resources are being used inefficiently. Second, the low average utilization rate of mammography equipment implied by these results necessitates charging a high price-over $100, on average-to cover costs. This price is above the $50 usually associated with low-cost screening mammography programs, and it may impede a desirable public health trend to increase use of mammography screening. Third, the existence of many mammography facilities operating at low capacity levels is inefficient from a health systems perspective, increasing the cost of quality assurance and medical record keeping. The current condition of excess supply is probably unsustainable over the long term.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2393209     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-7-547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  14 in total

1.  Predicting patterns of mammography use: a geographic perspective on national needs for intervention research.

Authors:  Julie Legler; Nancy Breen; Helen Meissner; Don Malec; Cathy Coyne
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Health care reform in the United States.

Authors:  C Hackler
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1993-06

3.  Breast screening.

Authors:  T Dixon
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Women and breast cancer: is it really possible for the public to be well informed?

Authors:  C J Baines
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  The impact of mammography quality improvement legislation in Michigan: implications for the National Mammography Quality Standards Act.

Authors:  L Fintor; M Brown; R Fischer; O Suleiman; C Garlinghouse; J Camburn; E Frazier; F Houn
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Race, health, and health services.

Authors:  L Bergner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Assessing prevention effectiveness using data to drive program decisions.

Authors:  S B Thacker; J P Koplan; W R Taylor; A R Hinman; M F Katz; W L Roper
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

8.  Geographic disparities in mammography capacity in the South: a longitudinal assessment of supply and demand.

Authors:  Jan M Eberth; Karl Eschbach; Jeffrey S Morris; Hoang T Nguyen; Md Monir Hossain; Linda S Elting
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Benefits of collecting local data on breast cancer and mammography practices in northwestern Pennsylvania.

Authors:  S A Norman; G B Weinberg; B R Krampe; E T Finnegan
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

10.  Changes in the use of screening mammography: evidence from the 1987 and 1990 National Health Interview Surveys.

Authors:  N Breen; L Kessler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.