Literature DB >> 16113365

Further validation of the Daily Living Tasks Dependent on Vision: identification of domains.

P M Hart1, M R Stevenson, A-M Montgomery, K A Muldrew, U Chakravarthy.   

Abstract

AIM: To examine the Daily Living Tasks Dependent on Vision (DLTV), a visual function questionnaire for domain structure, and redundancy.
METHOD: 235 subjects underwent full ophthalmic assessment and completed the DLTV questionnaire by interview. Principal component analysis with varimax rotation and item response theory (IRT) were used to assign the items to domains. The internal consistency of each domain was examined using Cronbach's alpha. Redundancy was assessed by regressing each item in a domain against the remainder of items in that domain.
RESULTS: Four domains were identified. Domain 1 was formed by nine items, which after applying IRT were seen to be among the most difficult questions in the instrument. Domain 2 contained eight items, all of which fell in the easier half of the instrument on applying IRT. Domain 3 contained only three items, all of which were among the easier questions and appear to deal with peripheral vision function. Domain 4 consisted of two items dealing with adaptation to light and dark conditions. Cronbach's alpha for each domain was 0.96, 0.93, 0.73, 0.66. Redundancy was found to be present in domain 1, which was therefore reduced by two items, with little effect on internal consistency.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors believe using the domains identified in this report will optimise the information provided by patients on their ability to function on visually demanding tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16113365      PMCID: PMC1772838          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2004.059683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  13 in total

1.  The development of the Melbourne low-vision ADL index: a measure of vision disability.

Authors:  S A Haymes; A W Johnston; A D Heyes
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Development of a questionnaire for measurement of vision-related quality of life.

Authors:  N A Frost; J M Sparrow; J S Durant; J L Donovan; T J Peters; S T Brookes
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.648

4.  Macular degeneration: do conventional measurements of impaired visual function equate with visual disability?

Authors:  M E McClure; P M Hart; A J Jackson; M R Stevenson; U Chakravarthy
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  A vision specific functional index for use in patients with age related macular degeneration.

Authors:  P M Hart; U Chakravarthy; M R Stevenson; J Q Jamison
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Laser treatment in subjects with high-risk clinical features of age-related macular degeneration. Posterior pole appearance and retinal function.

Authors:  R H Guymer; M Gross-Jendroska; S L Owens; A C Bird; F W Fitzke
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-05

Review 7.  Visual function assessment questionnaires.

Authors:  R W Massof; G S Rubin
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.048

8.  A self-assessment instrument designed for measuring independent mobility in RP patients: generalizability to glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Kathleen A Turano; Robert W Massof; Harry A Quigley
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Visual outcomes in the subfoveal radiotherapy study: a randomized controlled trial of teletherapy for age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  P M Hart; U Chakravarthy; G Mackenzie; I H Chisholm; A C Bird; M R Stevenson; S L Owens; V Hall; R F Houston; D W McCulloch; N Plowman
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-08

10.  Development of the 'Activities of Daily Vision Scale'. A measure of visual functional status.

Authors:  C M Mangione; R S Phillips; J M Seddon; M G Lawrence; E F Cook; R Dailey; L Goldman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  10 in total

1.  A qualitative investigation of visual tasks with which to assess distance-specific visual function.

Authors:  Mark J Atkinson; Steven Tally; Chris W Heichel; Igor Kozak; Jennifer Leich; Ashley Levack
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Visual functioning and quality of life in the SubFoveal Radiotherapy Study (SFRADS): SFRADS report 2.

Authors:  M R Stevenson; P M Hart; U Chakravarthy; G Mackenzie; A C Bird; S L Owens; I H Chisholm; V Hall; R F Houston; D W McCulloch; N Plowman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Quality of life in age-related macular degeneration: a review of available vision-specific psychometric tools.

Authors:  Robert P Finger; Monika Fleckenstein; Frank G Holz; Hendrik P N Scholl
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Patient-centred measurement in ophthalmology--a paradigm shift.

Authors:  Konrad Pesudovs
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 5.  Patient reported outcome measures for visual impairment after stroke: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lauren R Hepworth; Fiona J Rowe; Robert Harper; Kathryn Jarvis; Tracey Shipman; Helen Rodgers
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Development of a patient reported outcome measures for measuring the impact of visual impairment following stroke.

Authors:  Lauren R Hepworth; Fiona J Rowe; Girvan Burnside
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  A depth-based head-mounted visual display to aid navigation in partially sighted individuals.

Authors:  Stephen L Hicks; Iain Wilson; Louwai Muhammed; John Worsfold; Susan M Downes; Christopher Kennard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A prospective profile of visual field loss following stroke: prevalence, type, rehabilitation, and outcome.

Authors:  Fiona J Rowe; David Wright; Darren Brand; Carole Jackson; Shirley Harrison; Tallat Maan; Claire Scott; Linda Vogwell; Sarah Peel; Nicola Akerman; Caroline Dodridge; Claire Howard; Tracey Shipman; Una Sperring; Sonia Macdiarmid; Cicely Freeman
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Cataract surgery and quality of life implications.

Authors:  Daniel Morris; Scott G Fraser; Christopher Gray
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Theoretical and empirical dimensions of the Aberdeen Glaucoma Questionnaire: a cross sectional survey and principal component analysis.

Authors:  Maria Prior; Craig R Ramsay; Jennifer M Burr; Susan E Campbell; David J Jenkinson; Ryo Asoaka; Jillian J Francis
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 2.209

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.