Literature DB >> 12202505

A self-assessment instrument designed for measuring independent mobility in RP patients: generalizability to glaucoma patients.

Kathleen A Turano1, Robert W Massof, Harry A Quigley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether the patient-based assessment of difficulty in mobility, developed and validated in a group of patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP), is valid for measuring perceived visual ability for independent mobility in patients with glaucoma.
METHODS: A mobility questionnaire that had previously been developed was administered to 83 patient-volunteers who had various amounts of visual impairment caused by glaucoma. Each volunteer rated the perceived difficulty of walking independently in each of 35 mobility situations. A Rasch analysis of the ordinal difficulty ratings was used to estimate interval measures of perceived visual ability for independent mobility.
RESULTS: The instrument showed good construct and content validity and high reliability scores. Criterion validity of the instrument was demonstrated by its ability to discriminate mobility-related behaviors such as fear of falling, asking for accompaniment, and believing their ability to travel independently is less than that of persons with normal vision. To make the perceived mobility scale comparable for the two diagnostic groups the questionnaire was restricted to those items whose difference in item-logit distributions was within +/-3 (18 items). Using the same instrument calibration, we compared the person measures between the patients with glaucoma and those with RP. Patients with glaucoma had, on average, higher perceived visual ability for independent mobility than those with RP.
CONCLUSIONS: The instrument developed for patients with RP, to determine difficulty across a range of mobility situations, is a valid measure of perceived ability for independent mobility in patients with glaucoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12202505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  14 in total

Review 1.  Patient-reported outcomes (PRO's) in glaucoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Vandenbroeck; S De Geest; T Zeyen; I Stalmans; F Dobbels
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Further validation of the Daily Living Tasks Dependent on Vision: identification of domains.

Authors:  P M Hart; M R Stevenson; A-M Montgomery; K A Muldrew; U Chakravarthy
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Binocular visual field impairment in glaucoma and at-fault motor vehicle collisions.

Authors:  Gerald McGwin; Carrie Huisingh; Shelly G Jain; Christopher A Girkin; Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Multipurpose Spatiomotor Capture System for Haptic and Visual Training and Testing in the Blind and Sighted.

Authors:  Lora T Likova; Kristyo N Mineff; Christopher W Tyler
Journal:  IS&T Int Symp Electron Imaging       Date:  2021

Review 5.  Choosing appropriate patient-reported outcomes instrument for glaucoma research: a systematic review of vision instruments.

Authors:  Jemaima Che Hamzah; Jennifer M Burr; Craig R Ramsay; Augusto Azuara-Blanco; Maria Prior
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Echolocation may have real-life advantages for blind people: an analysis of survey data.

Authors:  Lore Thaler
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Assessment of night vision problems in patients with congenital stationary night blindness.

Authors:  Mieke M C Bijveld; Maria M van Genderen; Frank P Hoeben; Amir A Katzin; Ruth M A van Nispen; Frans C C Riemslag; Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Pre-validation methods for developing a patient reported outcome instrument.

Authors:  Maria E Prior; Jemaima Che Hamzah; Jillian J Francis; Craig R Ramsay; Mayret M Castillo; Susan E Campbell; Augusto Azuara-Blanco; Jennifer M Burr
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 9.  How do different lighting conditions affect the vision and quality of life of people with glaucoma? A systematic review.

Authors:  Jamie Enoch; Lee Jones; Deanna J Taylor; Carol Bronze; James F Kirwan; Pete R Jones; David P Crabb
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 10.  Quality of Life in Glaucoma: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Luciano Quaranta; Ivano Riva; Chiara Gerardi; Francesco Oddone; Irene Floriani; Anastasios G P Konstas
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 3.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.