Literature DB >> 16112589

Simultaneous recording of laser-evoked brain potentials and continuous, high-field functional magnetic resonance imaging in humans.

G D Iannetti1, R K Niazy, R G Wise, P Jezzard, J C W Brooks, L Zambreanu, W Vennart, P M Matthews, I Tracey.   

Abstract

Simultaneous recording of event-related electroencephalographic (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) responses has the potential to provide information on how the human brain reacts to an external stimulus with unique spatial and temporal resolution. However, in most studies combining the two techniques, the acquisition of functional MR images has been interleaved with the recording of evoked potentials. In this study we investigated the feasibility of recording pain-related evoked potentials during continuous and simultaneous collection of blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) functional MR images at 3 T. Brain potentials were elicited by selective stimulation of cutaneous Adelta and C nociceptors using brief radiant laser pulses (laser-evoked potentials, LEPs). MR-induced artifacts on EEG data were removed using a novel algorithm. Latencies, amplitudes, and scalp distribution of LEPs recorded during fMRI were not significantly different from those recorded in a control session outside of the MR scanner using the same equipment and experimental design. Stability tests confirmed that MR-image quality was not impaired by the evoked potential recording, beyond signal loss related to magnetic susceptibility differences local to the electrodes. fMRI results were consistent with our previous studies of brain activity in response to nociceptive stimulation. These results demonstrate the feasibility of recording reliable pain-related LEPs and fMRI responses simultaneously. Because LEPs collected during fMRI and those collected in a control session show remarkable similarity, for many experimental designs the integration of LEP and fMRI data collected in separate, single-modality acquisitions may be appropriate. Truly simultaneous recording of LEPs and fMRI is still desirable in specific experimental conditions, such as single-trial, learning, and pharmacological studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16112589     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  30 in total

Review 1.  From nociception to pain perception: imaging the spinal and supraspinal pathways.

Authors:  Jonathan Brooks; Irene Tracey
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  Role of neuroimaging in analgesic drug development.

Authors:  Jane Lawrence; Sean C Mackey
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2008

3.  Reference-free removal of EEG-fMRI ballistocardiogram artifacts with harmonic regression.

Authors:  Pavitra Krishnaswamy; Giorgio Bonmassar; Catherine Poulsen; Eric T Pierce; Patrick L Purdon; Emery N Brown
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Four-shell ellipsoidal model employing multipole expansion in ellipsoidal coordinates.

Authors:  John Blimke; Joel Myklebust; Hans Volkmer; Stephen Merrill
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Event-related potential and functional MRI measures of face-selectivity are highly correlated: a simultaneous ERP-fMRI investigation.

Authors:  Boaz Sadeh; Ilana Podlipsky; Andrey Zhdanov; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Concurrent EEG and Functional MRI Recording and Integration Analysis for Dynamic Cortical Activity Imaging.

Authors:  Thinh Nguyen; Thomas Potter; Christof Karmonik; Robert Grossman; Yingchun Zhang
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 7.  Can neuroimaging studies identify pain endophenotypes in humans?

Authors:  Irene Tracey
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 42.937

8.  Dynamic EEG-informed fMRI modeling of the pain matrix using 20-ms root mean square segments.

Authors:  Juergen Brinkmeyer; Arian Mobascher; Tracy Warbrick; Francesco Musso; Hans-Jörg Wittsack; Andreas Saleh; Alfons Schnitzler; Georg Winterer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Removal of BCG artifacts using a non-Kirchhoffian overcomplete representation.

Authors:  Mads Dyrholm; Robin Goldman; Paul Sajda; Truman R Brown
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Dishabituation of laser-evoked EEG responses: dissecting the effect of certain and uncertain changes in stimulus spatial location.

Authors:  D M Torta; M Liang; E Valentini; A Mouraux; G D Iannetti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.