Literature DB >> 20162596

Dynamic EEG-informed fMRI modeling of the pain matrix using 20-ms root mean square segments.

Juergen Brinkmeyer1, Arian Mobascher, Tracy Warbrick, Francesco Musso, Hans-Jörg Wittsack, Andreas Saleh, Alfons Schnitzler, Georg Winterer.   

Abstract

Previous studies on the spatio-temporal dynamics of cortical pain processing using electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), or intracranial recordings point towards a high degree of parallelism, e.g. parallel instead of sequential activation of primary and secondary somatosensory areas or simultaneous activation of somatosensory areas and the mid-cingulate cortex. However, because of the inverse problem, EEG and MEG provide only limited spatial resolution and certainty about the generators of cortical pain-induced electromagnetic activity, especially when multiple sources are simultaneously active. On the other hand, intracranial recordings are invasive and do not provide whole-brain coverage. In this study, we thought to investigate the spatio-temporal dynamics of cortical pain processing in 10 healthy subjects using simultaneous EEG/functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Voltages of 20 ms segments of the EEG root mean square (a global, largely reference-free measure of event-related EEG activity) in a time window 0-400 ms poststimulus were used to model trial-to-trial fluctuations in the fMRI blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal. EEG-derived regressors explained additional variance in the BOLD signal from 140 ms poststimulus onward. According to this analysis, the contralateral parietal operculum was the first cortical area to become activated upon painful laser stimulation. The activation pattern in BOLD analyses informed by subsequent EEG-time windows suggests largely parallel signal processing in the bilateral operculo-insular and mid-cingulate cortices. In that regard, our data are in line with previous reports. However, the approach presented here is noninvasive and bypasses the inverse problem using only temporal information from the EEG.
© 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20162596      PMCID: PMC6871058          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  58 in total

1.  Laser-evoked potentials: normative values.

Authors:  A Truini; F Galeotti; A Romaniello; M Virtuoso; G D Iannetti; G Cruccu
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Trial-by-trial coupling of concurrent electroencephalogram and functional magnetic resonance imaging identifies the dynamics of performance monitoring.

Authors:  Stefan Debener; Markus Ullsperger; Markus Siegel; Katja Fiehler; D Yves von Cramon; Andreas K Engel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Improving lesion-symptom mapping.

Authors:  Chris Rorden; Hans-Otto Karnath; Leonardo Bonilha
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  A study of the brain's resting state based on alpha band power, heart rate and fMRI.

Authors:  J C de Munck; S I Gonçalves; Th J C Faes; J P A Kuijer; P J W Pouwels; R M Heethaar; F H Lopes da Silva
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution.

Authors:  A J Bell; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  P300 and LORETA: comparison of normal subjects and schizophrenic patients.

Authors:  G Winterer; C Mulert; S Mientus; J Gallinat; P Schlattmann; H Dorn; W M Herrmann
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Dual representation of pain in the operculo-insular cortex in humans.

Authors:  Maud Frot; François Mauguière
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Equivalent electrical source analysis of pain-related somatosensory evoked potentials elicited by a CO2 laser.

Authors:  I M Tarkka; R D Treede
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.177

9.  Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. II. Medial, lateral and posterior temporal lobe.

Authors:  E Halgren; P Baudena; J M Clarke; G Heit; K Marinkovic; B Devaux; J P Vignal; A Biraben
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-04

10.  Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. I. Superior temporal plane and parietal lobe.

Authors:  E Halgren; P Baudena; J M Clarke; G Heit; C Liégeois; P Chauvel; A Musolino
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-03
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Neurological diseases and pain.

Authors:  David Borsook
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  High-Density Electroencephalography-Informed Multiband Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reveals Rhythm-Specific Activations Within the Trigeminal Nociceptive Network.

Authors:  Hauke Basedau; Kuan-Po Peng; Arne May; Jan Mehnert
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 5.152

3.  Ketamine effects on default mode network activity and vigilance: A randomized, placebo-controlled crossover simultaneous fMRI/EEG study.

Authors:  Norman Zacharias; Francesco Musso; Felix Müller; Florian Lammers; Andreas Saleh; Markus London; Peter de Boer; Georg Winterer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.038

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.