Literature DB >> 17624612

Simplified models to analyse time- and dose-dependent responses of populations to toxicants.

Francisco Sánchez-Bayo1, Kouichi Goka.   

Abstract

The basis of ecotoxicology lies currently in the dose-response of organisms to toxicants, as typically described by probit and logistic models. While recognising its merits, standard endpoints ignore the process of toxicity with time, and consequently our ability to predict direct toxic effects in environmental risk assessments is seriously curtailed. Although the response of toxicants with time has been studied before, its application in ecotoxicology remains underutilised. One reason is that no convincing mechanism has been proposed to explain the hyperbolic curves of such responses, whereas a variety of models have been used to describe them. The explanation of both time- and dose-dependent responses is found ultimately in the natural variability of receptor sites among individuals of populations exposed to a toxicant inhibitor with time. The process can be explained by the kinetics of inhibition, and is appropriately described by a simple mathematical expression like the Michaelis-Menten equation, though other asymptotic models (e.g. logistic model) can also be used. The advantage of the hyperbolic model is that median effect values (e.g. LC(50) for dose- and ET(50) for time-dependent responses) enable calculation of toxicity effects at any concentration level and/or time of exposure, thus making it especially attractive for risk assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17624612     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-007-0158-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  31 in total

Review 1.  Environmental monitoring of pesticides by immunoanalytical techniques: validation, current status, and future perspectives.

Authors:  N A Lee; I R Kennedy
Journal:  J AOAC Int       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.913

2.  Modeling explicitly and mechanistically median lethal concentration as a function of time for risk assessment.

Authors:  Vincent Bonnomet; Cédric Duboudin; Hélène Magaud; Eric Thybaud; Eric Vindimian; Bernard Beauzamy
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Prediction of time-dependent PAH toxicity in Hyalella azteca using a damage assessment model.

Authors:  Jong-Hyeon Lee; Peter F Landrum; Chul-Hwan Koh
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Simultaneous modeling of multiple end points in life-cycle toxicity tests.

Authors:  Tjalling Jager; Trudie Crommentuijn; Cornelis A M van Gestel; Sebastiaan A L M Kooijman
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 5.  Threshold levels for effects of insecticides in freshwater ecosystems: a review.

Authors:  René P A Van Wijngaarden; Theo C M Brock; Paul J Van den Brink
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Comparative acute toxicity of organic pollutants and reference values for crustaceans. I. Branchiopoda, Copepoda and Ostracoda.

Authors:  Francisco Sánchez-Bayo
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 8.071

7.  Time-to-event analyses of ecotoxicity data.

Authors:  M C Newman; J T McCloskey
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Temporal dynamics of effect concentrations.

Authors:  Olga Alda Alvarez; Tjalling Jager; Beatriz Nuñez Colao; Jan E Kammenga
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Variation in the sensitivity of aquatic species to toxicants.

Authors:  J A Hoekstra; M A Vaal; J Notenboom; W Slooff
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.151

10.  An approach to predict risks to wildlife populations from mercury and other stressors.

Authors:  Diane Nacci; Marguerite Pelletier; Jim Lake; Rick Bennett; John Nichols; Romona Haebler; Jason Grear; Anne Kuhn; Jane Copeland; Matthew Nicholson; Steven Walters; Wayne R Munns
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.823

View more
  5 in total

1.  From simple toxicological models to prediction of toxic effects in time.

Authors:  Francisco Sánchez-Bayo
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Relationship among aqueous copper half-lives and responses of Pimephales promelas to a series of copper sulfate pentahydrate concentrations.

Authors:  Alyssa J Calomeni; Ciera M Kinley; Tyler D Geer; Kyla J Iwinski; Maas Hendrikse; John H Rodgers
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-01-20       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Ecological risk assessment of PCBs and other organic contaminant residues in Laguna de Terminos, Mexico.

Authors:  Fernando P Carvalho; Jean-Pierre Villeneuve; Chantal Cattini; Jaime Rendón; J Mota de Oliveira
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Kinetic interpretation of log-logistic dose-time response curves.

Authors:  Walter W Focke; Isbe van der Westhuizen; Ndeke Musee; Mattheüs Theodor Loots
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The role of mGlu4 receptors within the nucleus accumbens in acquisition and expression of morphine-induced conditioned place preference in male rats.

Authors:  Zahra Ebrahimi; Nazanin Kahvandi; Alireza Komaki; Seyed Asaad Karimi; Marzieh Naderishahab; Abdolrahman Sarihi
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-21       Impact factor: 3.288

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.