Literature DB >> 22899440

A plea for the use of copepods in freshwater ecotoxicology.

Devdutt Kulkarni1, André Gergs, Udo Hommen, Hans Toni Ratte, Thomas G Preuss.   

Abstract

Standard species used in ecological risk assessment are chosen based on their sensitivity to various toxicants and the ease of rearing them for laboratory experiments. However, this mostly overlooks the fact that species in the field that may employ variable life-history strategies, which may have consequences concerning the vulnerability of such species to exposure with contaminants. We aimed to highlight the importance of copepods in ecology and to underline the need to include freshwater copepods in ecotoxicology. We carried out a literature search on copepods and Daphnia in ecology and ecotoxicology to compare the recognition given to these two taxa in these respective fields. We also conducted a detailed analysis of the literature on copepods and their current role in ecotoxicology to characterize the scale and depth of the studies and the ecotoxicological information therein. The literature on the ecology of copepods outweighed that in ecotoxicology when compared with daphnids. Copepods, like other zooplankton, were found to be sensitive to toxicants and important organisms in aquatic ecosystems. The few studies that were conducted on the ecotoxicology of copepods mainly focused on marine copepods. However, very little is known about the ecotoxicology of freshwater copepods. To enable a more realistic risk higher tier environmental risk assessment, we recommend considering freshwater copepods as part of the hazard assessment process. This could include the establishment of laboratory experiments to analyse the effects of toxicants on copepods and the development of individual-based models to extrapolate effects across species and scenarios.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22899440     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-012-1117-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  38 in total

1.  Species sensitivity distributions: data and model choice.

Authors:  J R Wheeler; E P M Grist; K M Y Leung; D Morritt; M Crane
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.553

2.  How risky is risk assessment: the role that life history strategies play in susceptibility of species to stress.

Authors:  John D Stark; John E Banks; Roger Vargas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Potential application of ecological models in the European environmental risk assessment of chemicals. I. Review of protection goals in EU directives and regulations.

Authors:  Udo Hommen; J M Hans Baveco; Nika Galic; Paul J van den Brink
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.992

4.  Using biological traits to predict species sensitivity to toxic substances.

Authors:  Donald J Baird; Paul J Van den Brink
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 6.291

5.  Responses of zooplankton in lufenuron-stressed experimental ditches in the presence or absence of uncontaminated refuges.

Authors:  Patricia López-Mancisidor; Paul J Van den Brink; Steven J H Crum; Steve J Maund; Gregoria Carbonell; Theo C M Brock
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 3.742

6.  Effect of 3,4-dichloroaniline and metavanadate on Daphnia populations.

Authors:  N van der Hoeven
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 6.291

Review 7.  Interactions between effects of environmental chemicals and natural stressors: a review.

Authors:  Martin Holmstrup; Anne-Mette Bindesbøl; Gertie Janneke Oostingh; Albert Duschl; Volker Scheil; Heinz-R Köhler; Susana Loureiro; Amadeu M V M Soares; Abel L G Ferreira; Cornelia Kienle; Almut Gerhardt; Ryszard Laskowski; Paulina E Kramarz; Mark Bayley; Claus Svendsen; David J Spurgeon
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Fipronil effects on estuarine copepod (Amphiascus tenuiremis) development, fertility, and reproduction: a rapid life-cycle assay in 96-well microplate format.

Authors:  G Thomas Chandler; Tawnya L Cary; David C Volz; Spencer S Walse; John L Ferry; Susan L Klosterhaus
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 9.  The copepod Tigriopus: a promising marine model organism for ecotoxicology and environmental genomics.

Authors:  Sheikh Raisuddin; Kevin W H Kwok; Kenneth M Y Leung; Daniel Schlenk; Jae-Seong Lee
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.964

10.  Ecological impacts of time-variable exposure regimes to the fungicide azoxystrobin on freshwater communities in outdoor microcosms.

Authors:  Mazhar Iqbal Zafar; J Dick M Belgers; Rene P A Van Wijngaarden; Arriënne Matser; Paul J Van den Brink
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.823

View more
  4 in total

1.  Proteogenomics of Gammarus fossarum to document the reproductive system of amphipods.

Authors:  Judith Trapp; Olivier Geffard; Gilles Imbert; Jean-Charles Gaillard; Anne-Hélène Davin; Arnaud Chaumot; Jean Armengaud
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Sensitivity of hypogean and epigean freshwater copepods to agricultural pollutants.

Authors:  T Di Lorenzo; W D Di Marzio; M E Sáenz; M Baratti; A A Dedonno; A Iannucci; S Cannicci; G Messana; D M P Galassi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Individual and mixture acute toxicity of model pesticides chlordecone and pyriproxyfen in the estuarine copepod Eurytemora affinis.

Authors:  Elena Legrand; Céline Boulangé-Lecomte; Gwendal Restoux; Gauthier Trémolet; Aurélie Duflot; Joëlle Forget-Leray
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Susceptibility of the Non-Targeted Crustacean Eurytemora affinis to the Endocrine Disruptor Tebufenozide: A Transcriptomic Approach.

Authors:  Caroline Arcanjo; Gauthier Trémolet; Nathalie Giusti-Petrucciani; Aurélie Duflot; Joëlle Forget-Leray; Céline Boulangé-Lecomte
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 4.096

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.