Literature DB >> 16108148

Evolutionary dynamics of altruism and cheating among social amoebas.

A Brännström1, U Dieckmann.   

Abstract

Dictyostelium discoideum is a eukaryotic amoeba, which, when starvation is imminent, aggregates to form fruiting bodies consisting of a stalk of reproductively dead cells that supports spores. Because different clones may be involved in such aggregations, cheater strategies may emerge that allocate a smaller fraction of cells to stalk formation, thus gaining a reproductive advantage. In this paper, we model the evolutionary dynamics of allocation strategies in Dictyostelium under the realistic assumption that the number of clones involved in aggregations follows a random distribution. By determining the full course of evolutionary dynamics, we show that evolutionary branching in allocation strategies may occur, resulting in dimorphic populations that produce stalkless and stalked fruiting bodies. We also demonstrate that such dimorphisms are more likely to emerge when the variation in the number of clones involved in aggregations is large.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16108148      PMCID: PMC1559842          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  16 in total

Review 1.  Developmental cheating and the evolutionary biology of Dictyostelium and Myxococcus.

Authors:  D N Dao; R H Kessin; H L Ennis
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.777

2.  Invasion dynamics and attractor inheritance.

Authors:  S A H Geritz; M Gyllenberg; F J A Jacobs; K Parvinen
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  A linear dominance hierarchy among clones in chimeras of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum.

Authors:  A Fortunato; D C Queller; J E Strassmann
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  Evolutionarily stable stalk to spore ratio in cellular slime molds and the law of equalization in net incomes.

Authors:  H Matsuda; Y Harada
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1990-12-07       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  How should we define 'fitness' for general ecological scenarios?

Authors:  J A Metz; R M Nisbet; S A Geritz
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  The evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  R Axelrod; W D Hamilton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-03-27       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Kin selection and strong evolutionary stability of mutual help.

Authors:  I Eshel; U Motro
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 1.570

8.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  Altruism, cheating, and anticheater adaptations in cellular slime molds.

Authors:  Richard Ellis Hudson; Juliann Eve Aukema; Claude Rispe; Denis Roze
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Co-occurrence in nature of different clones of the social amoeba, Dictyostelium discoideum.

Authors:  A Fortunato; J E Strassmann; L Santorelli; D C Queller
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.185

View more
  10 in total

1.  Adaptive dynamics of cooperation may prevent the coexistence of defectors and cooperators and even cause extinction.

Authors:  Kalle Parvinen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Consequences of fluctuating group size for the evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  Ake Brännström; Thilo Gross; Bernd Blasius; Ulf Dieckmann
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 3.  Dynamics in the mixed microbial concourse.

Authors:  Edwin H Wintermute; Pamela A Silver
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Cooperation is less likely to evolve in a finite population with a highly skewed distribution of family size.

Authors:  Sabin Lessard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  High relatedness maintains multicellular cooperation in a social amoeba by controlling cheater mutants.

Authors:  Owen M Gilbert; Kevin R Foster; Natasha J Mehdiabadi; Joan E Strassmann; David C Queller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Functional information and the emergence of biocomplexity.

Authors:  Robert M Hazen; Patrick L Griffin; James M Carothers; Jack W Szostak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Understanding microbial cooperation.

Authors:  James A Damore; Jeff Gore
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Synergy and group size in microbial cooperation.

Authors:  Daniel M Cornforth; David J T Sumpter; Sam P Brown; Åke Brännström
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Cheating is evolutionarily assimilated with cooperation in the continuous snowdrift game.

Authors:  Tatsuya Sasaki; Isamu Okada
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Multilevel selection analysis of a microbial social trait.

Authors:  Laura de Vargas Roditi; Kerry E Boyle; Joao B Xavier
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 11.429

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.