Literature DB >> 23657614

A preliminary study of the variability in location of the ureteral orifices with bladder filling by fluoroscopic guidance: the gender difference.

Insang Hwang1, Sun-Ouck Kim, Ho-Song Yu, Eu-Chang Hwang, Seung-Il Jung, Taek-Won Kang, Dongdeuk Kwon, Kwangsung Park.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To determine landmarks for stent positioning in both ureteral orifices (UOs) and the gender differences in their location in men and women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The location of the UO and the bladder neck (BN) was measured fluoroscopically by the intravesical distal location of an open-ended catheter marked with radiopaque materials. We compared the location in men (n = 12) and women (n = 12) with a full bladder (hydrostatic pressure of 50 cmH2O) or an empty bladder.
RESULTS: The mean distances from BN to UO in men and women were significantly different both in an empty bladder (2.5 ± 0.4 and 2.1 ± 0.3 cm, respectively) and in a full bladder (2.9 ± 1.0 and 2.3 ± 0.6 cm, respectively). The location of UO was changed by bladder filling in women but not in men. In women, most UOs were found superior to the symphysis pubis (SP) in empty bladder (66.6 %). Most of this location was observed at behind the upper boarder of SP in full bladder of women (75 %). The BN of women was located at the lower level in basal state compared to men. Also, the location of BN was markedly changed by bladder fulling in women (p = 0.04) but not in men.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant gender differences were observed in the location of UO and BN. Clinicians should keep in mind the anatomical differences between men and women during fluoroscopic-guided procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23657614     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-013-0463-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  17 in total

1.  Outpatient ureteric procedures: a new method for retrograde ureteropyelography and ureteric stent placement.

Authors:  J P McFarlane; C Cowan; S J Holt; M J Cowan
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Self-retained internal ureteral stents: a new approach.

Authors:  T W Hepperlen; H K Mardis; H Kammandel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Have stent-related symptoms anything to do with placement technique?

Authors:  A Rane; A Saleemi; D Cahill; S Sriprasad; N Shrotri; R Tiptaft
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Optimal prevention and management of proximal ureteral stent migration and remigration.

Authors:  R H Breau; R W Norman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Ureteroscopy: current practice and long-term complications.

Authors:  W J Harmon; P D Sershon; M L Blute; D E Patterson; J W Segura
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Retrograde or antegrade double-pigtail stent placement for malignant ureteric obstruction?

Authors:  M C Uthappa; N C Cowan
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.350

7.  Comparison of symptoms related to positioning of double-pigtail stent in upper pole versus renal pelvis.

Authors:  E N Liatsikos; D Gershbaum; R Kapoor; J Fogarty; C Z Dinlenc; N O Bernardo; A D Smith
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Retrograde ureteral stent exchange under fluoroscopic guidance.

Authors:  Orhan Ozkan; Devrim Akinci; Uğur Bozlar; Bahri Ustünsöz; Mustafa Ozmen; Okan Akhan
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.630

9.  Early and late complications of double pigtail ureteral stent.

Authors:  Rocco Damiano; Andrea Oliva; Ciro Esposito; Marco De Sio; Riccardo Autorino; Massimo D'Armiento
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Ureteral stents: exchange under fluoroscopic control as an effective alternative to cystoscopy.

Authors:  T de Baere; A Denys; P Pappas; E Challier; A Roche
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  2 in total

1.  Simplified method using kidney / ureter / bladder x-ray to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents.

Authors:  Makoto Taguchi; Kenji Yoshida; Motohiko Sugi; Hidefumi Kinoshita; Tadashi Matsuda
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

2.  A ureteral stent crossing the bladder midline leads to worse urinary symptoms.

Authors:  Makoto Taguchi; Kenji Yoshida; Motohiko Sugi; Tadashi Matsuda; Hidefumi Kinoshita
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2017-11-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.