PURPOSE: Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (MSCT-CA) for detecting significant stenosis (>or=50% lumen reduction) in a population of patients at low to intermediate risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 72 patients (38 men, 34 women, mean age 53.9+/-8.0 years) with atypical or typical chest pain and stratified in the low-to intermediate risk category. MSCT-CA (Sensation 64 Cardiac, Siemens, Germany) was performed after IV administration of 100 ml of iodinated contrast material (Iomeprol 400 mgI/ml, Bracco, Italy). Two observers, blinded to the results of conventional coronary angiography (CAG), assessed the MSCT-CA scans in consensus. Diagnostic accuracy for detecting significant stenosis was calculated. RESULTS: CAG demonstrated the absence of significant disease in 70.1% of patients (51/72). No patient was excluded from MSCT-CA. There were 37 significant lesions on 1,098 available coronary segments. Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive value of MSCT-CA for detecting significant coronary artery on a per-segment basis were 100%, 98.6%, 71.2% and 100%, respectively. All patients with at least one significant lesion were correctly identified by MSCT-CA. MSCT-CA scored 15 false positives on a per-segment base, which affected only marginally the per-patient performance (only one false positive). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that 64-slice CT-CA is a diagnostic modality with high sensitivity and negative predictive value in patients at low to intermediate risk.
PURPOSE: Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (MSCT-CA) for detecting significant stenosis (>or=50% lumen reduction) in a population of patients at low to intermediate risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 72 patients (38 men, 34 women, mean age 53.9+/-8.0 years) with atypical or typical chest pain and stratified in the low-to intermediate risk category. MSCT-CA (Sensation 64 Cardiac, Siemens, Germany) was performed after IV administration of 100 ml of iodinated contrast material (Iomeprol 400 mgI/ml, Bracco, Italy). Two observers, blinded to the results of conventional coronary angiography (CAG), assessed the MSCT-CA scans in consensus. Diagnostic accuracy for detecting significant stenosis was calculated. RESULTS: CAG demonstrated the absence of significant disease in 70.1% of patients (51/72). No patient was excluded from MSCT-CA. There were 37 significant lesions on 1,098 available coronary segments. Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive value of MSCT-CA for detecting significant coronary artery on a per-segment basis were 100%, 98.6%, 71.2% and 100%, respectively. All patients with at least one significant lesion were correctly identified by MSCT-CA. MSCT-CA scored 15 false positives on a per-segment base, which affected only marginally the per-patient performance (only one false positive). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that 64-slice CT-CA is a diagnostic modality with high sensitivity and negative predictive value in patients at low to intermediate risk.
Authors: Kai Uwe Juergens; Matthias Grude; David Maintz; Eva Maria Fallenberg; Thomas Wichter; Walter Heindel; Roman Fischbach Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-12-10 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Filippo Cademartiri; Giacomo Luccichenti; Riccardo Marano; Koen Nieman; Nico Mollet; Pim J de Feyter; Gabriel P Krestin; Paolo Pavone; Lorenzo Bonomo Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: W G Austen; J E Edwards; R L Frye; G G Gensini; V L Gott; L S Griffith; D C McGoon; M L Murphy; B B Roe Journal: Circulation Date: 1975-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Joanne D Schuijf; Jeroen J Bax; Liesbeth P Salm; J Wouter Jukema; Hildo J Lamb; Ernst E van der Wall; Albert de Roos Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2005-03-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Filippo Cademartiri; Giuseppe Runza; Manuel Belgrano; Giacomo Luccichenti; Nico R Mollet; Patrizia Malagutti; Marco Silvestrini; Massimo Midiri; Maria Cova; Roberto Pozzi Mucelli; Gabriel P Krestin Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2005 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Thorsten R C Johnson; Konstantin Nikolaou; Bernd J Wintersperger; Alexander W Leber; Franz von Ziegler; Carsten Rist; Sonja Buhmann; Andreas Knez; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-05-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Joanne D Schuijf; Gabija Pundziute; J Wouter Jukema; Hildo J Lamb; Bas L van der Hoeven; Albert de Roos; Ernst E van der Wall; Jeroen J Bax Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2006-05-19 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Stephan Achenbach; Dieter Ropers; Falk-Karsten Pohle; Dorette Raaz; Johannes von Erffa; Attila Yilmaz; Gerd Muschiol; Werner G Daniel Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2005-05-27 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Dieter Ropers; Ulrich Baum; Karsten Pohle; Katharina Anders; Stefan Ulzheimer; Bernd Ohnesorge; Christian Schlundt; Werner Bautz; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-02-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: C Martini; E Maffei; A Palumbo; A Weustink; T Baks; A Moelker; D Dunker; E Emiliano; A Cuttone; N Mollet; G Krestin; P De Feyter; F Cademartiri Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2009-12-16 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: E Maffei; C Martini; C Tedeschi; P Spagnolo; A Zuccarelli; T Arcadi; A Guaricci; S Seitun; A Weustink; N Mollet; F Cademartiri Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2011-06-04 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: E Maffei; C Martini; C Tedeschi; P Spagnolo; A Zuccarelli; T Arcadi; A Guaricci; S Seitun; A C Weustink; N R Mollet; F Cademartiri Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2011-06-04 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: L La Grutta; G Runza; G Gentile; E Russo; G Lo Re; M Galia; T V Bartolotta; V Alaimo; R Malagò; F Cademartiri; A E Cardinale; M Midiri Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2011-03-07 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: A Romagnoli; E Martuscelli; M Sperandio; C Arganini; B De Angelis; V Acampora; A Patrei; G Bazzocchi; F Romeo; G Simonetti Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2009-12-16 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: R Malagò; A Pezzato; C Barbiani; U Alfonsi; M D'Onofrio; D Tavella; P Benussi; R Pozzi Mucelli Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 3.469