Literature DB >> 16094058

Health related quality of life and direct medical care cost in newly diagnosed younger men with prostate cancer.

Ravishankar Jayadevappa1, Bernard S Bloom, Sumedha Chhatre, Kenneth M Fomberstein, Alan J Wein, S Bruce Malkowicz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated health related quality of life (HRQOL) and the direct medical care cost (DMC) in young men receiving radical prostatectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 40 newly diagnosed patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who were younger than 65 years were matched with 40 cancer-free men. Participants completed the Medical Outcome Study Short Form and UCLA-PCa Index surveys prior to treatment, and at 3, 6, 12 and 24-month followup. Cost data were obtained from a hospital based administrative database and clinical data were obtained via structured medical chart review. Demographics and HRQOL were compared using the t, Fisher exact and chi-square tests. The Wilcoxon and log-T tests were used to compare DMC. Multivariate regression models were used to assess the incremental cost of PCa and predictors of 24-month prostate specific HRQOL.
RESULTS: Patients with PCa had a mean annual DMC of 4,160 dollars for the treatment year with a mean length of stay of 3.5 days. They had 3-fold higher DMC than controls. At 12 months, generic HRQOL values were similar to baseline values. Sexual function showed trends toward improvement 6 months after surgery. Urinary function improved significantly by 6 months, although it decreased thereafter. Bowel function and bother returned to baseline values by 3 months. On multivariate regression marital status was a significant predictor of 5 domains of prostate specific HRQOL at 24 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PCa reported weaker sexual function, urinary function and sexual bother at 2 years after treatment compared with their baseline values. There exists an opportunity for improving prostate specific HRQOL in men with early stage PCa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16094058     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000169526.75984.89

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  7 in total

Review 1.  Critical comparison of laparoscopic, robotic, and open radical prostatectomy: techniques, outcomes, and cost.

Authors:  Matthew T Gettman; Michael L Blute
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  The cost of radical prostatectomy: retrospective comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted approaches.

Authors:  Jean V Joseph; Ann Leonhardt; Hitendra R H Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-02-07

3.  Cost study of the clinical management of prostate cancer in France: results on the basis of population-based data.

Authors:  Laurent Molinier; Christel Castelli; Eric Bauvin; Xavier Rebillard; Michel Soulié; Jean-Pierre Daurès; Pascale Grosclaude
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2010-06-13

4.  Comparative Effectiveness of Cancer Control and Survival after Robot-Assisted versus Open Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jim C Hu; Padraic O'Malley; Bilal Chughtai; Abby Isaacs; Jialin Mao; Jason D Wright; Dawn Hershman; Art Sedrakyan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Couple distress after localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne K Chambers; Leslie Schover; Lisa Nielsen; Kim Halford; Samantha Clutton; Robert A Gardiner; Jeff Dunn; Stefano Occhipinti
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  ProsCan for Couples: randomised controlled trial of a couples-based sexuality intervention for men with localised prostate cancer who receive radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Suzanne K Chambers; Leslie Schover; Kim Halford; Samantha Clutton; Megan Ferguson; Louisa Gordon; R A Gardiner; Stefano Occhipinti; Jeff Dunn
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 7.  Challenges to treat hypogonadism in prostate cancer patients: implications for endocrinologists, urologists and radiotherapists.

Authors:  Giovanni L Gravina; Stefania Di Sante; Erika Limoncin; Daniele Mollaioli; Giacomo Ciocca; Eleonora Carosa; Patrizia Sanità; Ernesto Di Cesare; Andrea Lenzi; Emmanuele A Jannini
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2015-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.