BACKGROUND: The experience of the diagnosis of prostate cancer is distressing for both men and their partners. The present study describes the prevalence of psychological distress in men with prostate cancer and their partners, and the predictors of adjustment outcomes. METHODS/ DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey of 189 prostate cancer patients who were scheduled for or had undergone surgery for localised prostate cancer and their partners assessed socio-demographic variables, masculine self-esteem and social intimacy, psychological adjustment and quality of life. RESULTS: Overall, patients and partners reported low distress; however, female partners were more anxious with 36 % reporting mild to severe anxiety. For men, masculine self-esteem and time since diagnosis were most strongly related to mental health status; urinary bother most influenced physical quality of life. For female partners, the man's psychological distress and his sexual bother were most strongly related to her mental health status; higher social intimacy was most strongly associated with physical quality of life. CONCLUSION: The correlates of distress after the diagnosis of prostate cancer differ between patients and female partners. For men, masculine self-esteem may be most crucial, whereas for women, her partner's level of distress may matter most. Research to better understand these interactions is needed.
BACKGROUND: The experience of the diagnosis of prostate cancer is distressing for both men and their partners. The present study describes the prevalence of psychological distress in men with prostate cancer and their partners, and the predictors of adjustment outcomes. METHODS/ DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey of 189 prostate cancerpatients who were scheduled for or had undergone surgery for localised prostate cancer and their partners assessed socio-demographic variables, masculine self-esteem and social intimacy, psychological adjustment and quality of life. RESULTS: Overall, patients and partners reported low distress; however, female partners were more anxious with 36 % reporting mild to severe anxiety. For men, masculine self-esteem and time since diagnosis were most strongly related to mental health status; urinary bother most influenced physical quality of life. For female partners, the man's psychological distress and his sexual bother were most strongly related to her mental health status; higher social intimacy was most strongly associated with physical quality of life. CONCLUSION: The correlates of distress after the diagnosis of prostate cancer differ between patients and female partners. For men, masculine self-esteem may be most crucial, whereas for women, her partner's level of distress may matter most. Research to better understand these interactions is needed.
Authors: Jeremy W Couper; Sidney Bloch; Anthony Love; Gillian Duchesne; Michelle Macvean; David W Kissane Journal: Med J Aust Date: 2006-10-16 Impact factor: 7.738
Authors: David P Smith; Rajah Supramaniam; Madeleine T King; Jeanette Ward; Martin Berry; Bruce K Armstrong Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sharon Manne; Jamie Ostroff; Gary Winkel; Lori Goldstein; Kevin Fox; Generosa Grana Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2004 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Leslie R Schover; Rachel T Fouladi; Carla L Warneke; Leah Neese; Eric A Klein; Craig Zippe; Patrick A Kupelian Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-10-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Linda E Carlson; Codie R Rouleau; Michael Speca; John Robinson; Barry D Bultz Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-01-07 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Donald Allensworth-Davies; James A Talcott; Timothy Heeren; Brian de Vries; Thomas O Blank; Jack A Clark Journal: LGBT Health Date: 2015-12-24 Impact factor: 4.151
Authors: John L Oliffe; Lawrence W Mróz; Joan L Bottorff; Debbie E Braybrook; Amanda Ward; S Larry Goldenberg; Larry S Goldenberg Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-12-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Sophie Schur; Alexandra Ebert-Vogel; Michaela Amering; Eva Katharina Masel; Marie Neubauer; Andrea Schrott; Ingrid Sibitz; Herbert Watzke; Beate Schrank Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Francesca E Duncan; Mary Zelinski; Alexander H Gunn; Jennifer E Pahnke; Conor L O'Neill; Nucharin Songsasen; Ryan I Woodruff; Teresa K Woodruff Journal: Reproduction Date: 2016-08-04 Impact factor: 3.906
Authors: Daniela Wittmann; Marsha Carolan; Barbara Given; Ted A Skolarus; Lawrence An; Ganesh Palapattu; James E Montie Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-04-13 Impact factor: 3.603