Literature DB >> 27637213

The cost of radical prostatectomy: retrospective comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted approaches.

Jean V Joseph1, Ann Leonhardt2, Hitendra R H Patel2,3.   

Abstract

New technologies are regularly being used for surgical treatment of prostate cancer, however the cost associated is often a secondary issue. We assessed the operative costs incurred by using the daVinci robot assisted prostatectomy (RAP) method compared to pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and open radical prostatectomy (ORP). We retrospectively analyzed three techniques of radical prostatectomies: ORP, LRP, and RAP (n = 70, 57, 106, respectively). The mean patient age was 53.6, 57.6, and 60 with a mean preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA) of 7.2, 8.4, and 6.6, respectively. The mean Gleason score was 6. Operative cost was measured for each patient. Charts were reviewed to assess individual patients postoperative requirements, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Intraoperative data show costs to be higher with the RAP and LRP compared to open surgery. Average total operating room (OR) costs per case were $5410, $3876, and $1870 for RAP, LRP, and open prostatectomy, respectively. However when comparisons are made in the postoperative period with regard to LOS, there is a significant advantage of the RAP and LRP groups over open surgery (P < 0.05). Intraoperative costs are highest for RAP. Both LRP and RAP are associated with a shorter hospital stay.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost; Laparoscopic prostatectomy; Prostate cancer; Robot-assisted prostatectomy

Year:  2008        PMID: 27637213     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-007-0052-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  8 in total

1.  The new economics of radical prostatectomy: cost comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot assisted techniques.

Authors:  Yair Lotan; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Matthew T Gettman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Local cost structures and the economics of robot assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Charles D Scales; Peter J Jones; Eric L Eisenstein; Glenn M Preminger; David M Albala
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Cost comparison of laparoscopic versus radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  J Kyle Anderson; Adam Murdock; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Yair Lotan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Robot-assisted vs pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: are there any differences?

Authors:  Jean V Joseph; Ivelisse Vicente; Ralph Madeb; Erdal Erturk; Hitendra R H Patel
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach.

Authors:  J V Joseph; R Rosenbaum; R Madeb; E Erturk; H R H Patel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  An economic overview of prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  H S Ruchlin; J M Pellissier
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Health related quality of life and direct medical care cost in newly diagnosed younger men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ravishankar Jayadevappa; Bernard S Bloom; Sumedha Chhatre; Kenneth M Fomberstein; Alan J Wein; S Bruce Malkowicz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Cost-efficient radical prostatectomy with a clinical care path.

Authors:  M S Litwin; R B Smith; A Thind; N Reccius; M Blanco-Yarosh; J B deKernion
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 7.450

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Technology diffusion and diagnostic testing for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Florian R Schroeck; Samuel R Kaufman; Bruce L Jacobs; Ted A Skolarus; David C Miller; Alon Z Weizer; Jeffrey S Montgomery; John T Wei; Vahakn B Shahinian; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 7.450

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.