Literature DB >> 16084210

In vivo contact areas of the knee in patients with patellar subluxation.

S Hinterwimmer1, M Gotthardt, R von Eisenhart-Rothe, S Sauerland, M Siebert, T Vogl, F Eckstein, H Graichen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Ex vivo studies have suggested that cartilage contact areas and pressure are of high clinical relevance in the etiology of osteoarthritis in patients with patellar subluxation. The aims of this study were therefore to validate in vivo measurements of contact areas with 3D open magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to study knee joint contact areas in patients with patellar subluxation at different angles of knee flexion in comparison with healthy subjects.
METHODS: 3D-MRI data sets of 12 healthy volunteers and eight patients with patellar subluxation were acquired using a standard clinical (1.5 T) and an open (0.2 T) MRI scanner. We compared femoro-patellar and femoro-tibial contact areas obtained with two different sequences from open MRI [dual-echo-steady-state (DESS) and fast-low-angle-shot (FLASH) sequences] with those derived from standard clinical 1.5 T MRI. We then analyzed differences in joint contact areas between healthy subjects and patients with patellar subluxation at 0 degree, 30 degrees, and 90 degrees of knee flexion using open MRI.
RESULTS: The correlation of the size of contact areas from open MRI with standard clinical MRI data ranged from r = 0.52 to 0.92. Open-MRI DESS displayed a smaller overestimation of joint contact areas (+21% in the femoro-patellar, +12% in the medial femoro-tibial, and +19% in the lateral femoro-tibial compartment) than FLASH (+40%, +37%, +30%, respectively). The femoro-patellar contact areas in patients were significantly reduced in comparison with healthy subjects (-47% at 0 degree, -56% at 30 degrees, and -42% at 90 degrees of flexion; all p < 0.01), whereas no significant difference was observed in femoro-tibial contact areas.
CONCLUSIONS: Open MRI allows one to quantify joint contact areas of the knee with reasonable accuracy, if an adequate pulse sequence is applied. The technique permits one to clearly identify differences between patients with patellar subluxation and healthy subjects at different flexion angles, demonstrating a significant reduction and lateralization of contact areas in patients. In the future, application of this in vivo technique is of particular interest for monitoring the efficacy of different types of surgical and conservative treatment options for patellar subluxation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16084210     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Patellofemoral arthroplasty: indication, technique and results].

Authors:  M Cotic; A B Imhoff
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Comparison of MRI-based estimates of articular cartilage contact area in the tibiofemoral joint.

Authors:  Christopher E Henderson; Jill S Higginson; Peter J Barrance
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Medial patellar retinaculum plasty versus medial capsule reefing for patellar subluxation in adult.

Authors:  Long-fei Ma; Fei Wang; Bai-cheng Chen; Cheng-hai Wang; Jian-wei Zhou; Gang Ji; Jiang-tao Dong
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.071

Review 4.  Functional imaging in OA: role of imaging in the evaluation of tissue biomechanics.

Authors:  C P Neu
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Increased tibiofemoral cartilage contact deformation in patients with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency.

Authors:  Samuel K Van de Velde; Jeffrey T Bingham; Ali Hosseini; Michal Kozanek; Louis E DeFrate; Thomas J Gill; Guoan Li
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2009-12

6.  In vivo cartilage contact deformation in the healthy human tibiofemoral joint.

Authors:  J T Bingham; R Papannagari; S K Van de Velde; C Gross; T J Gill; D T Felson; H E Rubash; G Li
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 7.580

7.  Tibiofemoral and patellofemoral mechanics are altered at small knee flexion angles in people with patellofemoral pain.

Authors:  Gretchen B Salsich; William H Perman
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 4.319

Review 8.  Treatment Options for Patellofemoral Arthritis.

Authors:  Anne Kuwabara; Mark Cinque; Taylor Ray; Seth Lawrence Sherman
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2022-02-04

9.  Targeted physiotherapy for patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis: a protocol for a randomised, single-blind controlled trial.

Authors:  Kay M Crossley; Bill Vicenzino; Marcus G Pandy; Anthony G Schache; Rana S Hinman
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Arthroscopic lateral retinacular release improves patello-femoral and femoro-tibial kinematics in patients with isolated lateral retinacular tightness.

Authors:  Florian Pohlig; Ulrich Lenze; Florian Walter Lenze; Igor Lazic; Alexander Haug; Stefan Hinterwimmer; Heiko Graichen; Ruediger von Eisenhart-Rothe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 4.342

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.