Literature DB >> 21186904

Comparison of MRI-based estimates of articular cartilage contact area in the tibiofemoral joint.

Christopher E Henderson1, Jill S Higginson, Peter J Barrance.   

Abstract

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) detrimentally impacts the lives of millions of older Americans through pain and decreased functional ability. Unfortunately, the pathomechanics and associated deviations from joint homeostasis that OA patients experience are not well understood. Alterations in mechanical stress in the knee joint may play an essential role in OA; however, existing literature in this area is limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of an existing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based modeling method to estimate articular cartilage contact area in vivo. Imaging data of both knees were collected on a single subject with no history of knee pathology at three knee flexion angles. Intra-observer reliability and sensitivity studies were also performed to determine the role of operator-influenced elements of the data processing on the results. The method's articular cartilage contact area estimates were compared with existing contact area estimates in the literature. The method demonstrated an intra-observer reliability of 0.95 when assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient and was found to be most sensitive to changes in the cartilage tracings on the peripheries of the compartment. The articular cartilage contact area estimates at full extension were similar to those reported in the literature. The relationships between tibiofemoral articular cartilage contact area and knee flexion were also qualitatively and quantitatively similar to those previously reported. The MRI-based knee modeling method was found to have high intra-observer reliability, sensitivity to peripheral articular cartilage tracings, and agreeability with previous investigations when using data from a single healthy adult. Future studies will implement this modeling method to investigate the role that mechanical stress may play in progression of knee OA through estimation of articular cartilage contact area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21186904      PMCID: PMC3068480          DOI: 10.1115/1.4002938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  15 in total

1.  In vivo determination of contact areas and pressure of the femorotibial joint using non-linear finite element analysis.

Authors:  D. Périé; M.C. Hobatho
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  A three-dimensional MRI analysis of knee kinematics.

Authors:  Vikas V Patel; Katherine Hall; Michael Ries; Jeff Lotz; Eugene Ozhinsky; Colleen Lindsey; Ying Lu; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  In vivo contact areas of the knee in patients with patellar subluxation.

Authors:  S Hinterwimmer; M Gotthardt; R von Eisenhart-Rothe; S Sauerland; M Siebert; T Vogl; F Eckstein; H Graichen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Correlation between the knee adduction torque and medial contact force for a variety of gait patterns.

Authors:  Dong Zhao; Scott A Banks; Kim H Mitchell; Darryl D D'Lima; Clifford W Colwell; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Tibiofemoral contact area--determination and implications.

Authors:  D B Kettelkamp; A W Jacobs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee.

Authors:  E S Grood; W J Suntay
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Patellofemoral joint contact area increases with knee flexion and weight-bearing.

Authors:  Thor F Besier; Christine E Draper; Garry E Gold; Gary S Beaupré; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Weight-bearing MRI of patellofemoral joint cartilage contact area.

Authors:  Garry E Gold; Thor F Besier; Christine E Draper; Deanna S Asakawa; Scott L Delp; Gary S Beaupre
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Baseline articular contact stress levels predict incident symptomatic knee osteoarthritis development in the MOST cohort.

Authors:  Neil A Segal; Donald D Anderson; Krishna S Iyer; Jennifer Baker; James C Torner; John A Lynch; David T Felson; Cora E Lewis; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  The contact area and pressure distribution pattern of the knee. A study of normal and osteoarthrotic knee joints.

Authors:  T Fukubayashi; H Kurosawa
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1980-12
View more
  1 in total

1.  COMT Val158Met, but not BDNF Val66Met, is associated with white matter abnormalities of the temporal lobe in patients with first-episode, treatment-naïve major depressive disorder: a diffusion tensor imaging study.

Authors:  Kenji Hayashi; Reiji Yoshimura; Shingo Kakeda; Taro Kishi; Osamu Abe; Wakako Umene-Nakano; Asuka Katsuki; Hikaru Hori; Atsuko Ikenouchi-Sugita; Keita Watanabe; Satoru Ide; Issei Ueda; Junji Moriya; Nakao Iwata; Yukunori Korogi; Marek Kubicki; Jun Nakamura
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.570

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.