Literature DB >> 16082809

Vector averaging of inhibition of return.

Raymond M Klein1, John Christie, Eric P Morris.   

Abstract

Observers detected targets presented 400 msec after a display containing one cue or two to four cues displayed simultaneously in randomly selected locations on a virtual circle around fixation. The cue arrangement was completely uninformative about the upcoming target's location, and eye position was monitored to ensure that the participants maintained fixation between the cue and their manual detection response. Reflecting inhibition of return (IOR), there was a gradient of performance following single cues, with reaction time decreasing monotonically as the target's angular distance from the cued direction increased. An equivalent gradient of IOR was found following multiple cues whose center of gravity fell outside the parafoveal region and, thus, whose net vector would activate an orienting response. Moreover, on these trials, whether or not the targeted location had been stimulated by a cue had little effect on this gradient. Finally, when the array of cues was balanced so that its center of gravity was at fixation, there was no IOR. These findings, which suggest that IOR is an aftermath of orienting elicited by the cue, are compatible with population coding of the entire cue (as a grouped array for multiple cues) as the generator of IOR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16082809     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  16 in total

1.  Shapes, surfaces and saccades.

Authors:  D Melcher; E Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Unmasking the inhibition of return phenomenon.

Authors:  S Danziger; A Kingstone
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-08

3.  The spatial distribution of inhibition of return.

Authors:  P J Bennett; J Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-01

4.  Inhibition of return.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Inhibition of return and visual search: how many separate loci are inhibited?

Authors:  J J Snyder; A Kingstone
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-04

6.  Influence of previous visual stimulus or saccade on saccadic reaction times in monkey.

Authors:  M C Dorris; T L Taylor; R M Klein; D P Munoz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Saccadic localization of random dot targets.

Authors:  J W McGowan; E Kowler; A Sharma; C Chubb
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Inhibition-of-return at multiple locations in visual space.

Authors:  R D Wright; C M Richard
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1996-09

9.  Relating the mechanisms of orienting and alerting.

Authors:  D Fernandez-Duque; M I Posner
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations.

Authors:  R D Rafal; P A Calabresi; C W Brennan; T K Sciolto
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Reconceptualizing inhibition of return as habituation of the orienting response.

Authors:  Kristie R Dukewich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

2.  Spatial distribution of attentional inhibition is not altered in healthy aging.

Authors:  Linda K Langley; Nora D Gayzur; Alyson L Saville; Shanna L Morlock; Angela G Bagne
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  The preservation of response inhibition aftereffects in a location-based spatial negative priming task: younger versus older adults.

Authors:  Eric Buckolz; Michael Lok; Ben Kajaste; Cameron Edgar; Michael Khan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-02-16

4.  Multiple cueing dissociates location- and feature-based repetition effects.

Authors:  Kesong Hu; Junya Zhan; Bingzhao Li; Shuchang He; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Out with the new, in with the old: Exogenous orienting to locations with physically constant stimulation.

Authors:  J Eric T Taylor; Matthew D Hilchey; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

6.  Eye movements are primed toward the center of multiple stimuli even when the interstimulus distances are too large to generate saccade averaging.

Authors:  John Christie; Matthew D Hilchey; Ramesh Mishra; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The effect of previous trial type on inhibition of return.

Authors:  Michael D Dodd; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-11-22

8.  Revisiting the global effect and inhibition of return.

Authors:  Jelmer P De Vries; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Ignace T C Hooge; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The mechanism underlying inhibition of saccadic return.

Authors:  Casimir J H Ludwig; Simon Farrell; Lucy A Ellis; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Environment- and eye-centered inhibitory cueing effects are both observed after a methodological confound is eliminated.

Authors:  Tao He; Yun Ding; Zhiguo Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.