Literature DB >> 21264706

Spatial distribution of attentional inhibition is not altered in healthy aging.

Linda K Langley1, Nora D Gayzur, Alyson L Saville, Shanna L Morlock, Angela G Bagne.   

Abstract

Inhibition of return (IOR) is a phenomenon of attentional orienting that is indexed by slower responses to targets presented at previously attended locations. The purpose of this study was to examine adult age differences in the distribution of IOR to multiple locations. In three experiments, young adults (ages 18-30 years) and older adults (ages 60-87 years) completed an IOR task that varied in the number of simultaneous onset cues (one to seven) and the number of display locations (four or eight). Analyses were conducted to explore whether IOR patterns were most consistent with limited inhibitory resources, with regional distribution of inhibition, or with vector averaging of cues. The IOR effects were most consistent with vector averaging, such that multiple cues initiated a directional gradient of inhibition centered on the average direction of the cues. The IOR patterns varied minimally with age, consistent with the conclusion that older adults and young adults distributed inhibition in a similar manner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21264706      PMCID: PMC3064718          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-010-0059-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  26 in total

1.  Inhibition of return and visual search: how many separate loci are inhibited?

Authors:  J J Snyder; A Kingstone
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-04

2.  The role of spatial working memory in inhibition of return: evidence from divided attention tasks.

Authors:  Alan D Castel; Jay Pratt; Fergus I M Craik
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-08

3.  Inhibition of return with rapid serial shifts of attention: implications for memory and visual search.

Authors:  Michael D Dodd; Alan D Castel; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-10

4.  Examining inhibition of return with onset and offset cues in the multiple-cuing paradigm.

Authors:  Elina Birmingham; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2004-11-24

5.  Differential age effects on attention-based inhibition: inhibitory tagging and inhibition of return.

Authors:  Linda K Langley; Ana B Vivas; Luis J Fuentes; Angela G Bagne
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2005-06

6.  Aging and temporal patterns of inhibition of return.

Authors:  Linda K Langley; Luis J Fuentes; Ana B Vivas; Alyson L Saville
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.077

7.  Examining inhibition of return with multiple sequential cues in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Jay Pratt; Alison L Chasteen
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2007-06

8.  Spatially diffuse inhibition affects multiple locations: a reply to Tipper, Weaver, and Watson (1996).

Authors:  R A Abrams; J Pratt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Inhibition of return and visuospatial attention in healthy older adults and individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer type.

Authors:  M E Faust; D A Balota
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Adult age differences in the time course of inhibition of return.

Authors:  Alan D Castel; Alison L Chasteen; Charles T Scialfa; Jay Pratt
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.077

View more
  4 in total

1.  The impact of red light running camera flashes on younger and older drivers' attention and oculomotor control.

Authors:  Timothy J Wright; Thomas Vitale; Walter R Boot; Neil Charness
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-10-19

2.  Inhibition of return revisited: Localized inhibition on top of a pervasive bias.

Authors:  Benchi Wang; Chuyao Yan; Raymond M Klein; Zhiguo Wang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

3.  Eye movements are primed toward the center of multiple stimuli even when the interstimulus distances are too large to generate saccade averaging.

Authors:  John Christie; Matthew D Hilchey; Ramesh Mishra; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Revisiting the global effect and inhibition of return.

Authors:  Jelmer P De Vries; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Ignace T C Hooge; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.