Literature DB >> 16082532

The inversion effect on gaze perception reflects processing of component information.

Adrian Schwaninger1, Janek S Lobmaier, Martin H Fischer.   

Abstract

When faces are turned upside-down they are much more difficult to recognize than other objects. This "face inversion effect" has often been explained in terms of configural processing, which is impaired when faces are rotated away from the upright. Here we report a "gaze inversion effect" and discuss whether it is related to configural face processing of the whole face. Observers reported the gaze locations of photographed upright or inverted faces. When whole faces were presented, we found an inversion effect both for constant errors and observer sensitivity. These results were closely replicated when only the eyes were visible. Together, our findings suggest that gaze processing is largely based on component-based information from the eye region. Processing this information is orientation-sensitive and does not seem to rely on configural processing of the whole face.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16082532     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2367-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  27 in total

1.  When inverted faces are recognized: the role of configural information in face recognition.

Authors:  H Leder; V Bruce
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2000-05

2.  Effect of inversion on the recognition of external and internal facial features.

Authors:  Israel Nachson; Mali Shechory
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2002-03

Review 3.  Featural vs. configurational information in faces: a conceptual and empirical analysis.

Authors:  Sam S Rakover
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2002-02

4.  Configural information is processed differently in perception and recognition of faces.

Authors:  Adrian Schwaninger; Stefan Ryf; Franziska Hofer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Configural processing in the perception of eye-gaze direction.

Authors:  Jenny Jenkins; Stephen R H Langton
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex.

Authors:  D I Perrett; J K Hietanen; M W Oram; P J Benson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1992-01-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Human neural systems for face recognition and social communication.

Authors:  James V Haxby; Elizabeth A Hoffman; M Ida Gobbini
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  Where am I looking? The accuracy of video-mediated gaze awareness.

Authors:  C Gale; A F Monk
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-04

9.  What causes the face inversion effect?

Authors:  M J Farah; J W Tanaka; H M Drain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces.

Authors:  S Carey; R Diamond
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-01-21       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  7 in total

1.  For the mind's eye the world is two-dimensional.

Authors:  Janek S Lobmaier; Fred W Mast; Heiko Hecht
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-02

2.  Is it in the eyes? Dissociating the role of emotion and perceptual features of emotionally expressive faces in modulating orienting to eye gaze.

Authors:  Sarah J Bayless; Missy Glover; Margot J Taylor; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2011-03-21

3.  How ubiquitous is the direct-gaze advantage? Evidence for an averted-gaze advantage in a gaze-discrimination task.

Authors:  Eva Riechelmann; Matthias Gamer; Anne Böckler; Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Contrast reversal of the iris and sclera increases the face sensitive N170.

Authors:  Kelly J Jantzen; Nicole McNamara; Adam Harris; Anna Schubert; Michael Brooks; Matthew Seifert; Lawrence A Symons
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 3.473

5.  How facial masks alter the interaction of gaze direction, head orientation, and emotion recognition.

Authors:  Lea Thomas; Christoph von Castell; Heiko Hecht
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 5.152

6.  The influences of face inversion and facial expression on sensitivity to eye contact in high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Mark D Vida; Daphne Maurer; Andrew J Calder; Gillian Rhodes; Jennifer A Walsh; Matthew V Pachai; M D Rutherford
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-11

7.  Recognition and eye movements with partially hidden pictures of faces and cars in different orientations.

Authors:  Nicholas J Wade; Benjamin W Tatler
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2010-11-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.