Literature DB >> 11839099

Featural vs. configurational information in faces: a conceptual and empirical analysis.

Sam S Rakover1.   

Abstract

The perception and memory of faces have been accounted for by the processing of two kinds of facial information: featural and configurational. The starting point of this article is the definition and accepted usage of these two concepts of facial information. I discuss these definitions and their various ramifications from three aspects: methodological, theoretical and empirical. In the section on methodology, I review several of the basic manipulations for changing facial information. In the theoretical section, I consider four fundamental hypotheses associated with these two kinds of facial information: the featural, configurational, holistic and norm hypotheses (the norm-based hypothesis and the 'hierarchy of schemas' hypothesis). In the section on empirical evidence, I survey relevant studies on the topic and consider these hypotheses through a description of various empirical phenomena that carry clear implications for the subject of the study. In conclusion, I propose two alternative directions for future research: first, a 'task-information' approach, which involves specifying what information is used for different tasks; and secondly, taking a different approach to the definition of the visual features for face processing, for example by using principal components analysis (PCA).

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11839099     DOI: 10.1348/000712602162427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  17 in total

1.  Forward masking of faces by spatially quantized random and structured masks: on the roles of wholistic configuration, local features, and spatial-frequency spectra in perceptual identification.

Authors:  Talis Bachmann; Iiris Luiga; Endel Põder
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-12-24

2.  The inversion effect on gaze perception reflects processing of component information.

Authors:  Adrian Schwaninger; Janek S Lobmaier; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  When false recognition is out of control: the case of facial conjunctions.

Authors:  Todd C Jones; James C Bartlett
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-03

4.  A feature-inversion effect: can an isolated feature show behavior like the face-inversion effect?

Authors:  Sam S Rakover
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

Review 5.  The neuropsychology of face perception: beyond simple dissociations and functional selectivity.

Authors:  Anthony P Atkinson; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Explaining the face-inversion effect: the face-scheme incompatibility (FSI) model.

Authors:  Sam S Rakover
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

7.  Discrimination and recognition of faces with changed configuration.

Authors:  Adam Sandford; Markus Bindemann
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-02

8.  The face inversion effect in infants is driven by high, and not low, spatial frequencies.

Authors:  Karen R Dobkins; Rachael Harms
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Configural and featural processing in humans with congenital prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Janek S Lobmaier; Jens Bölte; Fred W Mast; Christian Dobel
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-07-01

10.  Galvanic vestibular stimulation speeds visual memory recall.

Authors:  David Wilkinson; Sophie Nicholls; Charlotte Pattenden; Patrick Kilduff; William Milberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.