Literature DB >> 14700253

Configural processing in the perception of eye-gaze direction.

Jenny Jenkins1, Stephen R H Langton.   

Abstract

Traditional accounts of gaze perception emphasise the geometric or configural cues present in the eye; the position of the iris in relation to the corner of the eye, for example. This kind of geometric account has been supported, in part, by findings that gaze judgments are impaired in faces rotated through 180 degrees, a manipulation known to disrupt the processing of relations between facial elements. However, studies involving this manipulation have confounded inversion of the face context with inversion of the eye region. The effects of inversion might therefore have been caused by a disruption of the computation of gaze direction from the eye region itself and/or a disruption of the influence that face context might exert on gaze processing. In the experiment reported here we independently manipulated eye orientation and the orientation of the face context, and measured participants' sensitivity to gaze direction. Performance was severely affected by inversion of the eyes, regardless of the orientation of the face, whereas face inversion had no significant effect on gaze sensitivity. Previous reports of a face-inversion effect on gaze perception can therefore be attributed to inversion of the eye region itself which, we suggest, disrupts some form of configural or relational processing that is normally involved in the computation of eye-gaze direction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14700253     DOI: 10.1068/p3398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  15 in total

1.  Eye direction aftereffect.

Authors:  Jun'ichiro Seyama; Ruth S Nagayama
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-09-18

2.  Effect of image orientation on the eye direction aftereffect.

Authors:  Jun'ichiro Seyama
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-05-21

3.  The inversion effect on gaze perception reflects processing of component information.

Authors:  Adrian Schwaninger; Janek S Lobmaier; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Do the upright eyes have it?

Authors:  Atsushi Senju; Toshikazu Hasegawa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

Review 5.  Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences.

Authors:  Alexandra Frischen; Andrew P Bayliss; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Early and late cortical responses to directly gazing faces are task dependent.

Authors:  Nicolas Burra; David Framorando; Alan J Pegna
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Is it in the eyes? Dissociating the role of emotion and perceptual features of emotionally expressive faces in modulating orienting to eye gaze.

Authors:  Sarah J Bayless; Missy Glover; Margot J Taylor; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2011-03-21

8.  Autistic traits influence gaze-oriented attention to happy but not fearful faces.

Authors:  Amandine Lassalle; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 2.083

9.  Visual Information Routes in the Posterior Dorsal and Ventral Face Network Studied with Intracranial Neurophysiology and White Matter Tract Endpoints.

Authors:  M Babo-Rebelo; A Puce; D Bullock; L Hugueville; F Pestilli; C Adam; K Lehongre; V Lambrecq; V Dinkelacker; N George
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  The influences of face inversion and facial expression on sensitivity to eye contact in high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Mark D Vida; Daphne Maurer; Andrew J Calder; Gillian Rhodes; Jennifer A Walsh; Matthew V Pachai; M D Rutherford
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.