Literature DB >> 16078092

Reduction of pain and fracture incidence after kyphoplasty: 1-year outcomes of a prospective controlled trial of patients with primary osteoporosis.

Ingo A Grafe1, Katharina Da Fonseca, Jochen Hillmeier, Peter-Jürgen Meeder, Martin Libicher, Gerd Nöldge, Hubert Bardenheuer, Walter Pyerin, Linus Basler, Christel Weiss, Rod S Taylor, Peter Nawroth, Christian Kasperk.   

Abstract

Previously, we reported significantly reduced pain and improved mobility persisting for 6 months after kyphoplasty of chronically painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures in the first prospective controlled trial. Since improvement of spinal biomechanics by restoration of vertebral morphology may affect the incidence of fracture, long-term clinical benefit and thereby cost-effectiveness, here we extend our previous work to assess occurrence of new vertebral fractures and clinical parameters 1 year after kyphoplasty compared with a conservatively treated control group. Sixty patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures due to primary osteoporosis were included: 40 patients were treated with kyphoplasty, 20 served as controls. All patients received standard medical treatment. Morphological characteristics, new vertebral fractures, pain (visual analog scale), physical function [European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study (EVOS) score] (range 0-100 each) and back-pain-related doctors' visits were re-assessed 12 months after kyphoplasty. There were significantly fewer patients with new vertebral fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine, after 12-months, in the kyphoplasty group than in the control group (P=0.0084). Pain scores improved from 26.2 to 44.4 in the kyphoplasty group and changed from 33.6 to 34.3 in the control group (P=0.008). Kyphoplasty treated patients required a mean of 5.3 back-pain-related doctors' visits per patient compared with 11.6 in the control group during 12 months follow-up (P=0.006). Kyphoplasty as an addition to medical treatment and when performed in appropriately selected patients by an interdisciplinary team persistently improves pain and reduces occurrence of new vertebral fractures and healthcare utilization for at least 12 months in individuals with primary osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16078092     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-1982-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  33 in total

1.  Multiple adjacent vertebral fractures after kyphoplasty in a patient with steroid-induced osteoporosis.

Authors:  Marcella A Donovan; Alexander G Khandji; Ethel Siris
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-02-09       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 2.  Treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures with percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty.

Authors:  N B Watts; S T Harris; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Defining incident vertebral deformity: a prospective comparison of several approaches. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  D M Black; L Palermo; M C Nevitt; H K Genant; L Christensen; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  [Development and validation of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Spine Score].

Authors:  C Knop; M Oeser; L Bastian; U Lange; M Zdichavsky; M Blauth
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Treatment of painful vertebral fractures by kyphoplasty in patients with primary osteoporosis: a prospective nonrandomized controlled study.

Authors:  Christian Kasperk; Jochen Hillmeier; Gerd Nöldge; Ingo A Grafe; Katharina Dafonseca; Dorothea Raupp; Hubert Bardenheuer; Martin Libicher; Ute Monika Liegibel; Ulrike Sommer; Ulrike Hilscher; Walter Pyerin; Marcus Vetter; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Peter-Jürgen Meeder; Rod S Taylor; Peter Nawroth
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-12-06       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Differences in motor recruitment and resulting kinematics between low back pain patients and asymptomatic participants during lifting exertions.

Authors:  Sue A Ferguson; William S Marras; Deborah L Burr; Kermit G Davis; Purnendu Gupta
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  Kyphoplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a prospective non-randomized study.

Authors:  Ulrich Berlemann; Torsten Franz; Rene Orler; Paul F Heini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-04-09       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Primary and secondary osteoporosis' incidence of subsequent vertebral compression fractures after kyphoplasty.

Authors:  James S Harrop; Bronco Prpa; Mary Kay Reinhardt; Isador Lieberman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The effects of twelve weeks of bed rest on bone histology, biochemical markers of bone turnover, and calcium homeostasis in eleven normal subjects.

Authors:  J E Zerwekh; L A Ruml; F Gottschalk; C Y Pak
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  A family history of fracture and fracture risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; H Johansson; A Oden; O Johnell; C De Laet; J A Eisman; E V McCloskey; D Mellstrom; L J Melton; H A P Pols; J Reeve; A J Silman; A Tenenhouse
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  42 in total

1.  Vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty in osteoporosis: friends or foes?

Authors:  Gemma Marcucci; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2009-09

2.  Comparison of 5766 vertebral compression fractures treated with or without kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Jay M Zampini; Andrew P White; Kevin J McGuire
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  [DVO guideline 2006. What changes have there been in the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of osteoporosis?].

Authors:  W J Fassbender; U C Stumpf
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 4.  Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty: how good is the evidence?

Authors:  Fergus E McKiernan
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 5.  Kyphoplasty: an assessment of a new technology.

Authors:  H J Cloft; M E Jensen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  [Kyphoplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic spine fractures. Experience in over 500 patients].

Authors:  A Prokop; C Koukal; R Dolezych; M Chmielnicki
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.281

7.  Vertebral height restoration: deflating the rhetoric.

Authors:  F McKiernan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  [Kyphoplasty : method for minimally invasive treatment of painful vertebral fractures].

Authors:  C Kasperk; G Nöldge; P Meeder; P Nawroth; F X Huber
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  [Kyphoplasty in osteoporotic spinal fractures].

Authors:  A Prokop; F Löhlein; M Chmilniecki; J Volbracht; M Manner
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 10.  [Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review].

Authors:  R Felder-Puig; B Piso; B Guba; G Gartlehner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.