Literature DB >> 16078024

Kinesthetic, but not visual, motor imagery modulates corticomotor excitability.

Cathy M Stinear1, Winston D Byblow, Maarten Steyvers, Oron Levin, Stephan P Swinnen.   

Abstract

The hypothesis that motor imagery and actual movement involve overlapping neural structures in the central nervous system is supported by multiple lines of evidence. The aim of this study was to examine the modulation of corticomotor excitability during two types of strategies for motor imagery: Kinesthetic Motor Imagery (KMI) and Visual Motor Imagery (VMI) in a phasic thumb movement task. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied over the contralateral motor cortex (M1) to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the dominant abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM). In a separate experiment, transcutaneous electrical stimuli were delivered to the median nerve at the dominant wrist, to elicit F-waves from APB. Imagined task performance was paced with a 1 Hz auditory metronome, and stimuli were delivered either 50 ms before (ON phase), or 450 ms after (OFF phase), the metronome beeps. Recordings were also made during two control conditions: Rest, and a Visual Static Imagery (VSI) condition. Significant MEP amplitude facilitation occurred only in APB, and only during the ON phase of KMI. F-wave persistence and amplitude were unaffected by imagery. These results demonstrate that kinesthetic, but not visual, motor imagery modulates corticomotor excitability, primarily at the supraspinal level. These findings have implications for the definition of motor imagery, and for its therapeutic applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16078024     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0078-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  6 in total

1.  Motor imagery of phasic thumb abduction temporally and spatially modulates corticospinal excitability.

Authors:  Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Modulation of corticospinal excitability and intracortical inhibition during motor imagery is task-dependent.

Authors:  Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Facilitation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle is dependent on different motor images.

Authors:  S Yahagi; T Kasai
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-10

4.  An increase in cortical excitability with no change in spinal excitability during motor imagery.

Authors:  S Yahagi; K Shimura; T Kasai
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1996-08

5.  Mental practice effect on line-tracing accuracy in persons with hemiparetic stroke: a preliminary study.

Authors:  E Yoo; E Park; B Chung
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Using motor imagery in the rehabilitation of hemiparesis.

Authors:  Jennifer A Stevens; Mary Ellen Phillips Stoykov
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.966

  6 in total
  94 in total

1.  Can imagery become reality?

Authors:  E L Santarcangelo; E Scattina; G Carli; B Ghelarducci; P Orsini; D Manzoni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Contribution of the primary motor cortex to motor imagery: a subthreshold TMS study.

Authors:  Barbara Pelgrims; Nicolas Michaux; Etienne Olivier; Michael Andres
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Motor imagery-based skill acquisition disrupted following rTMS of the inferior parietal lobule.

Authors:  Sarah N Kraeutner; Laura T Keeler; Shaun G Boe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  New evidence of corticospinal network modulation induced by motor imagery.

Authors:  Sidney Grosprêtre; Florent Lebon; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Alain Martin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Trade-off between frequency and precision during stepping movements: Kinematic and BOLD brain activation patterns.

Authors:  Martin Martínez; Miguel Valencia; Marta Vidorreta; Elkin O Luis; Gabriel Castellanos; Federico Villagra; Maria A Fernández-Seara; Maria A Pastor
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Self-selected conscious strategies do not modulate motor cortical output during action observation.

Authors:  Katherine R Naish; Sukhvinder S Obhi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Effects of visual-motor illusion on functional connectivity during motor imagery.

Authors:  Katsuya Sakai; Keisuke Goto; Junpei Tanabe; Kazu Amimoto; Ken Kumai; Hiroyo Kamio; Yumi Ikeda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Motor planning, imagery, and execution in the distributed motor network: a time-course study with functional MRI.

Authors:  Takashi Hanakawa; Michael A Dimyan; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Imagined actions in multiple sclerosis patients: evidence of decline in motor cognitive prediction.

Authors:  Andrea Tacchino; Marco Bove; Ludovico Pedullà; Mario Alberto Battaglia; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Giampaolo Brichetto
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  [Cognitive-perceptive approaches in the treatment of chronic pain].

Authors:  C Storz; H Schulte-Göcking; M Azqueta; C Wania; M Neugebauer; A Reiners; S Azad; E Kraft
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.