Literature DB >> 26487181

Motor imagery-based skill acquisition disrupted following rTMS of the inferior parietal lobule.

Sarah N Kraeutner, Laura T Keeler, Shaun G Boe.   

Abstract

Motor imagery (MI), the mental rehearsal of motor tasks, has promise as a therapy in post-stroke rehabilitation. The potential effectiveness of MI is attributed to the facilitation of plasticity in numerous brain regions akin to those recruited for physical practice. It is suggested, however, that MI relies more heavily on regions commonly affected post-stroke, including left hemisphere parietal regions involved in visuospatial processes. However, the impact of parietal damage on MI-based skill acquisition that underlies rehabilitation remains unclear. Here, we examine the contribution of the left inferior parietal lobule (IPL) to MI using inhibitory transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and an MI-based implicit sequence learning (ISL) paradigm. Participants (N = 27) completed the MI-based ISL paradigm after receiving continuous theta burst stimulation to the left IPL (TMS), or with the coil angled away from the scalp (sham). Reaction time differences (dRT) and effect sizes between implicit and random sequences assessed success of MI-based learning. Mean dRT for the sham group was 36.1 ± 28.2 ms (d = 0.71). Mean dRT in the TMS group was 7.7 ± 38.5 ms (d = 0.11). These results indicate that inhibition of the left IPL impaired MI-based learning. We conclude that the IPL and likely the visuospatial processes it mediates are critical for MI performance and thus MI-based skill acquisition or learning. Ultimately, these findings have implications for the use of MI in post-stroke rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26487181     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4472-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  58 in total

Review 1.  Central mechanisms of motor skill learning.

Authors:  Okihide Hikosaka; Kae Nakamura; Katsuyuki Sakai; Hiroyuki Nakahara
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Complex movements evoked by microstimulation of the ventral intraparietal area.

Authors:  Dylan F Cooke; Charlotte S R Taylor; Tirin Moore; Michael S A Graziano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Low-frequency rTMS over lateral premotor cortex induces lasting changes in regional activation and functional coupling of cortical motor areas.

Authors:  Wei-Hung Chen; Tatsuya Mima; Hartwig R Siebner; Tatsuhide Oga; Hidemi Hara; Takeshi Satow; Tahamina Begum; Takashi Nagamine; Hiroshi Shibasaki
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  One session of repeated parietal theta burst stimulation trains induces long-lasting improvement of visual neglect.

Authors:  Thomas Nyffeler; Dario Cazzoli; Christian W Hess; René M Müri
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Parietofrontal integrity determines neural modulation associated with grasping imagery after stroke.

Authors:  Ethan R Buch; Amirali Modir Shanechi; Alissa D Fourkas; Cornelia Weber; Niels Birbaumer; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  The mental representation of hand movements after parietal cortex damage.

Authors:  A Sirigu; J R Duhamel; L Cohen; B Pillon; B Dubois; Y Agid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-09-13       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  The left parietal and premotor cortices: motor attention and selection.

Authors:  M F S Rushworth; H Johansen-Berg; S M Göbel; J T Devlin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  Specific Brain Lesions Impair Explicit Motor Imagery Ability: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Kerry McInnes; Christopher Friesen; Shaun Boe
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Multimodal functional imaging of motor imagery using a novel paradigm.

Authors:  Hana Burianová; Lars Marstaller; Paul Sowman; Graciela Tesan; Anina N Rich; Mark Williams; Greg Savage; Blake W Johnson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  Using human brain lesions to infer function: a relic from a past era in the fMRI age?

Authors:  Chris Rorden; Hans-Otto Karnath
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 34.870

View more
  9 in total

1.  Motor imagery training: Kinesthetic imagery strategy and inferior parietal fMRI activation.

Authors:  Florent Lebon; Ulrike Horn; Martin Domin; Martin Lotze
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Motor Imagery: How to Assess, Improve Its Performance, and Apply It for Psychosis Diagnostics.

Authors:  Alla Chepurova; Alexander Hramov; Semen Kurkin
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-11

3.  Damage to Fronto-Parietal Networks Impairs Motor Imagery Ability after Stroke: A Voxel-Based Lesion Symptom Mapping Study.

Authors:  Kristine M Oostra; Anke Van Bladel; Ann C L Vanhoonacker; Guy Vingerhoets
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 4.  Motor Imagery-Based Rehabilitation: Potential Neural Correlates and Clinical Application for Functional Recovery of Motor Deficits after Stroke.

Authors:  Yanna Tong; John T Pendy; William A Li; Huishan Du; Tong Zhang; Xiaokun Geng; Yuchuan Ding
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 6.745

Review 5.  Does Motor Simulation Theory Explain the Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying Motor Imagery? A Critical Review.

Authors:  Helen O'Shea; Aidan Moran
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Combined action observation and motor imagery therapy: a novel method for post-stroke motor rehabilitation.

Authors:  Jonathan R Emerson; Jack A Binks; Matthew W Scott; Ryan P W Kenny; Daniel L Eaves
Journal:  AIMS Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-21

7.  Leveraging the effector independent nature of motor imagery when it is paired with physical practice.

Authors:  Sarah N Kraeutner; Jennifer L McArthur; Paul H Kraeutner; David A Westwood; Shaun G Boe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  An ALE meta-analytic review of top-down and bottom-up processing of music in the brain.

Authors:  Victor Pando-Naude; Agata Patyczek; Leonardo Bonetti; Peter Vuust
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Online and Offline Performance Gains Following Motor Imagery Practice: A Comprehensive Review of Behavioral and Neuroimaging Studies.

Authors:  Franck Di Rienzo; Ursula Debarnot; Sébastien Daligault; Elodie Saruco; Claude Delpuech; Julien Doyon; Christian Collet; Aymeric Guillot
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.