Literature DB >> 14997259

Modulation of corticospinal excitability and intracortical inhibition during motor imagery is task-dependent.

Cathy M Stinear1, Winston D Byblow.   

Abstract

Previous studies have clearly shown that motor imagery modulates corticospinal excitability. However, there is no clear evidence for the modulation of intracortical inhibition (ICI) during imagined task performance. The aim of this study was to use transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess changes in corticospinal excitability and ICI during the imagined performance of two types of task. In Experiment 1, eight subjects performed phasic depression of a computer mouse button using the dominant index finger in time with a 1 Hz auditory metronome. Single and paired pulse magnetic stimuli were delivered at rest, and during the 'on' and 'off' phases of actual and imagined task performance. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from FDI and APB. In Experiment 2, eight subjects performed phasic isometric abduction of the dominant thumb in time with a 1 Hz auditory metronome. As before, single and paired pulse magnetic stimuli were delivered at rest, and during the 'on' and 'off' phases of actual and imagined task performance. In both experiments, the conditioning stimulus intensity was set to produce 50% inhibition at rest, to enable both increases and decreases in ICI during task performance to be detected. No significant temporal or spatial modulation of MEP amplitude or ICI was observed in Experiment 1. In contrast, MEP amplitude was significantly greater, and ICI significantly lower during the 'on' phase of imagined task performance in Experiment 2. These results are most likely related to the higher levels of target muscle activation required during actual task performance and the greater anatomical distance between target and control muscles in Experiment 2. These task characteristics may influence the observed degree of corticospinal excitability and ICI modulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14997259     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1851-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  23 in total

1.  Corticospinal excitability modulation to hand muscles during movement imagery.

Authors:  P M Rossini; S Rossi; P Pasqualetti; F Tecchio
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Changes of intracortical inhibition during motor imagery in human subjects.

Authors:  G Abbruzzese; A Assini; A Buccolieri; R Marchese; C Trompetto
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1999-03-26       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Role of intracortical inhibition in selective hand muscle activation.

Authors:  Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Motor imagery of phasic thumb abduction temporally and spatially modulates corticospinal excitability.

Authors:  Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Facilitation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle is dependent on different motor images.

Authors:  S Yahagi; T Kasai
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-10

6.  Task-dependent changes of intracortical inhibition.

Authors:  J Liepert; J Classen; L G Cohen; M Hallett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Do imagined and executed actions share the same neural substrate?

Authors:  J Decety
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1996-03

8.  Evidence for facilitation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by motor imagery.

Authors:  T Kasai; S Kawai; M Kawanishi; S Yahagi
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1997-01-02       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Impairment of motor imagery in putamen lesions in humans.

Authors:  C R Li
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2000-06-16       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  24 in total

1.  Kinesthetic, but not visual, motor imagery modulates corticomotor excitability.

Authors:  Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow; Maarten Steyvers; Oron Levin; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Movement-specific enhancement of corticospinal excitability at subthreshold levels during motor imagery.

Authors:  Sheng Li
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Motor excitability during imagination and observation of foot dorsiflexions.

Authors:  Joachim Liepert; Nina Neveling
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Motor cortex excitability changes during imagery of simple reaction time.

Authors:  Hatice Kumru; Oscar Soto; Jordi Casanova; Josep Valls-Sole
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Unilateral imagined movement increases interhemispheric inhibition from the contralateral to ipsilateral motor cortex.

Authors:  Nan Liang; Kozo Funase; Makoto Takahashi; Kanji Matsukawa; Tatsuya Kasai
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Modulation of motor cortex inhibition during motor imagery.

Authors:  Benjamin W X Chong; Cathy M Stinear
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation and visual illusion on neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Maria Dolors Soler; Hatice Kumru; Raul Pelayo; Joan Vidal; Josep Maria Tormos; Felipe Fregni; Xavier Navarro; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Abnormal motor excitability in patients with psychogenic paresis. A TMS study.

Authors:  Joachim Liepert; Thomas Hassa; Oliver Tüscher; Roger Schmidt
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  How does transcranial magnetic stimulation modify neuronal activity in the brain? Implications for studies of cognition.

Authors:  Hartwig R Siebner; Gesa Hartwigsen; Tanja Kassuba; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Cortical inhibition is reduced following short-term training in young and older adults.

Authors:  Anita Christie; Gary Kamen
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2013-08-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.