Literature DB >> 16059870

Properties of R(2) statistics for logistic regression.

Bo Hu1, Mari Palta, Jun Shao.   

Abstract

Various R(2) statistics have been proposed for logistic regression to quantify the extent to which the binary response can be predicted by a given logistic regression model and covariates. We study the asymptotic properties of three popular variance-based R(2) statistics. We find that two variance-based R(2) statistics, the sum of squares and the squared Pearson correlation, have identical asymptotic distribution whereas the third one, Gini's concentration measure, has a different asymptotic behaviour and may overstate the predictivity of the model and covariates when the model is mis-specified. Our result not only provides a theoretical basis for the findings in previous empirical and numerical work, but also leads to asymptotic confidence intervals. Statistical variability can then be taken into account when assessing the predictive value of a logistic regression model.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16059870     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  11 in total

1.  Novel metrics for evaluating improvement in discrimination: net reclassification and integrated discrimination improvement for normal variables and nested models.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Olga V Demler
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Measures to summarize and compare the predictive capacity of markers.

Authors:  Wen Gu; Margaret Pepe
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 0.968

3.  Evaluating health risk models.

Authors:  Alice S Whittemore
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Performance of reclassification statistics in comparing risk prediction models.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook; Nina P Paynter
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 2.207

6.  Development and validation of a cardiovascular disease risk-prediction model using population health surveys: the Cardiovascular Disease Population Risk Tool (CVDPoRT).

Authors:  Douglas G Manuel; Meltem Tuna; Carol Bennett; Deirdre Hennessy; Laura Rosella; Claudia Sanmartin; Jack V Tu; Richard Perez; Stacey Fisher; Monica Taljaard
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  A new Elixhauser-based comorbidity summary measure to predict in-hospital mortality.

Authors:  Nicolas R Thompson; Youran Fan; Jarrod E Dalton; Lara Jehi; Benjamin P Rosenbaum; Sumeet Vadera; Sandra D Griffith
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Andrew J Vickers; Nancy R Cook; Thomas Gerds; Mithat Gonen; Nancy Obuchowski; Michael J Pencina; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  Partial summary measures of the predictiveness curve.

Authors:  Michael C Sachs; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 2.207

10.  A flexible alternative to the Cox proportional hazards model for assessing the prognostic accuracy of hospice patient survival.

Authors:  Branko Miladinovic; Ambuj Kumar; Rahul Mhaskar; Sehwan Kim; Ronald Schonwetter; Benjamin Djulbegovic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.