Literature DB >> 30037888

Development and validation of a cardiovascular disease risk-prediction model using population health surveys: the Cardiovascular Disease Population Risk Tool (CVDPoRT).

Douglas G Manuel1, Meltem Tuna2, Carol Bennett2, Deirdre Hennessy2, Laura Rosella2, Claudia Sanmartin2, Jack V Tu2, Richard Perez2, Stacey Fisher2, Monica Taljaard2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Routinely collected data from large population health surveys linked to chronic disease outcomes create an opportunity to develop more complex risk-prediction algorithms. We developed a predictive algorithm to estimate 5-year risk of incident cardiovascular disease in the community setting.
METHODS: We derived the Cardiovascular Disease Population Risk Tool (CVDPoRT) using prospectively collected data from Ontario respondents of the Canadian Community Health Surveys, representing 98% of the Ontario population (survey years 2001 to 2007; follow-up from 2001 to 2012) linked to hospital admission and vital statistics databases. Predictors included body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, and multiple behavioural, demographic and general health risk factors. The primary outcome was the first major cardiovascular event resulting in hospital admission or death. Death from a noncardiovascular cause was considered a competing risk.
RESULTS: We included 104 219 respondents aged 20 to 105 years. There were 3709 cardiovascular events and 818 478 person-years follow-up in the combined derivation and validation cohorts (5-year cumulative incidence function, men: 0.026, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.025-0.028; women: 0.018, 95% 0.017-0.019). The final CVDPoRT algorithm contained 12 variables, was discriminating (men: C statistic 0.82, 95% CI 0.81-0.83; women: 0.86, 95% CI 0.85-0.87) and was well-calibrated in the overall population (5-year observed cumulative incidence function v. predicted risk, men: 0.28%; women: 0.38%) and in nearly all predefined policy-relevant subgroups (206 of 208 groups).
INTERPRETATION: The CVDPoRT algorithm can accurately discriminate cardiovascular disease risk for a wide range of health profiles without the aid of clinical measures. Such algorithms hold potential to support precision medicine for individual or population uses. Study registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT02267447.
© 2018 Joule Inc. or its licensors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30037888      PMCID: PMC6056289          DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.170914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  45 in total

1.  Simplifying a prognostic model: a simulation study based on clinical data.

Authors:  Gareth Ambler; Anthony R Brady; Patrick Royston
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Comparisons of established risk prediction models for cardiovascular disease: systematic review.

Authors:  George C M Siontis; Ioanna Tzoulaki; Konstantinos C Siontis; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-05-24

Review 3.  Cardiovascular risk prediction: basic concepts, current status, and future directions.

Authors:  Donald M Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Use of Brier score to assess binary predictions.

Authors:  Kaspar Rufibach
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Commentary: Reporting standards are needed for evaluations of risk reclassification.

Authors:  Margaret S Pepe; Holly Janes
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  The inevitable application of big data to health care.

Authors:  Travis B Murdoch; Allan S Detsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Hospitalization rates among economic immigrants to Canada.

Authors:  Edward Ng; Claudia Sanmartin; Douglas G Manuel
Journal:  Health Rep       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.796

Review 8.  Net reclassification indices for evaluating risk prediction instruments: a critical review.

Authors:  Kathleen F Kerr; Zheyu Wang; Holly Janes; Robyn L McClelland; Bruce M Psaty; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  A population-based risk algorithm for the development of diabetes: development and validation of the Diabetes Population Risk Tool (DPoRT).

Authors:  Laura C Rosella; Douglas G Manuel; Charles Burchill; Thérèse A Stukel
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Commentary: assessing population (baseline) risk is a cornerstone of population health planning--looking forward to address new challenges.

Authors:  Douglas G Manuel; Laura C Rosella
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  13 in total

1.  Individual risk prediction using data beyond the medical clinic.

Authors:  Robert M Califf; Frank E Harrell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Adherence to emerging plant-based dietary patterns and its association with cardiovascular disease risk in a nationally representative sample of Canadian adults.

Authors:  Svilena V Lazarova; Jason M Sutherland; Mahsa Jessri
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 8.472

3.  Perspective: Big Data and Machine Learning Could Help Advance Nutritional Epidemiology.

Authors:  Jason D Morgenstern; Laura C Rosella; Andrew P Costa; Russell J de Souza; Laura N Anderson
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 8.701

4.  The Canadian Health Clock and health calculators.

Authors:  Bernard C K Choi; Douglas G Manuel
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2020-07-14

5.  Study of cardiovascular disease prediction model based on random forest in eastern China.

Authors:  Li Yang; Haibin Wu; Xiaoqing Jin; Pinpin Zheng; Shiyun Hu; Xiaoling Xu; Wei Yu; Jing Yan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  "AI's gonna have an impact on everything in society, so it has to have an impact on public health": a fundamental qualitative descriptive study of the implications of artificial intelligence for public health.

Authors:  Jason D Morgenstern; Laura C Rosella; Mark J Daley; Vivek Goel; Holger J Schünemann; Thomas Piggott
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Machine learning algorithms for predicting undernutrition among under-five children in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Fikrewold H Bitew; Corey S Sparks; Samuel H Nyarko
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 4.022

8.  Prediction of risk of prolonged post-concussion symptoms: Derivation and validation of the TRICORDRR (Toronto Rehabilitation Institute Concussion Outcome Determination and Rehab Recommendations) score.

Authors:  Laura Kathleen Langer; Seyed Mohammad Alavinia; David Wyndham Lawrence; Sarah Elizabeth Patricia Munce; Alice Kam; Alan Tam; Lesley Ruttan; Paul Comper; Mark Theodore Bayley
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  International population-based health surveys linked to outcome data: A new resource for public health and epidemiology.

Authors:  Stacey Fisher; Carol Bennett; Deirdre Hennessy; Tony Robertson; Alastair Leyland; Monica Taljaard; Claudia Sanmartin; Prabhat Jha; John Frank; Jack V Tu; Laura C Rosella; JianLi Wang; Christopher Tait; Douglas G Manuel
Journal:  Health Rep       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 6.094

Review 10.  Predicting population health with machine learning: a scoping review.

Authors:  Jason Denzil Morgenstern; Emmalin Buajitti; Meghan O'Neill; Thomas Piggott; Vivek Goel; Daniel Fridman; Kathy Kornas; Laura C Rosella
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.