Literature DB >> 11771654

Relationships between bone mineral density and incident vertebral fracture risk with raloxifene therapy.

Somnath Sarkar1, Bruce H Mitlak, Mayme Wong, John L Stock, Dennis M Black, Kristine D Harper.   

Abstract

Although low absolute values of bone mineral density (BMD) predict increased fracture risk in osteoporosis, it is not certain how well increases in BMD with antiresorptive therapy predict observed reductions in fracture risk. This work examines the relationships between changes in BMD after 1 year or 3 years of raloxifene or placebo therapy and the risk for new vertebral fractures at 3 years. In the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) trial, 7705 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized to placebo or raloxifene 60 mg/day or 120 mg/day. Relationships between baseline BMD and changes in BMD from baseline with the risk of new vertebral fractures were analyzed in this cohort using logistic regression models with the raloxifene doses pooled. As has been observed in other populations, women with the lowest baseline lumbar spine or femoral neck BMD in the MORE cohort had the greatest risk for vertebral fractures. Furthermore, for any percentage change, either increase or decrease in femoral neck or lumbar spine BMD at 1 year or 3 years, raloxifene-treated patients had a statistically significantly lower vertebral fracture risk compared with placebo-treated patients. The decrease in fracture risk with raloxifene was similar across the range of percentage change in femoral neck BMD observed at 3 years; patients receiving raloxifene had a 36% lower risk of vertebral fracture compared with those receiving placebo. At any percentage change in femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD observed at 1 year, raloxifene treatment decreased the risks of new vertebral fractures at 3 years by 38% and 41%, respectively. The logistic regression model showed that the percentage changes in BMD with raloxifene treatment accounted for 4% of the observed vertebral fracture risk reduction, and the other 96% of the risk reduction remains unexplained. The present data show that the measured BMD changes observed with raloxifene therapy are poor predictors of vertebral fracture risk reduction with raloxifene therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11771654     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  97 in total

Review 1.  Remodeling and skeletal fragility.

Authors: 
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Role of collagen and other organics in the mechanical properties of bone.

Authors: 
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Effects of raloxifene treatment on the structural geometry of the proximal femur in Japanese women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Junichi Takada; Takami Miki; Yasuo Imanishi; Kiyoshi Nakatsuka; Hiroshi Wada; Hiroshi Naka; Takashi Yoshizaki; Kousuke Iba; Thomas J Beck; Toshihiko Yamashita
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 4.  Evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a consensus document of the Belgian Bone Club.

Authors:  Steven Boonen; Jean-Jacques Body; Yves Boutsen; Jean-Pierre Devogelaer; Stefan Goemaere; Jean-Marc Kaufman; Serge Rozenberg; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Quantification of trabecular bone structure using magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla--calibration studies using microcomputed tomography as a standard of reference.

Authors:  C A Sell; J N Masi; A Burghardt; D Newitt; T M Link; S Majumdar
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 6.  The elusive concept of bone quality.

Authors:  Robert R Recker; M Janet Barger-Lux
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 7.  Bone remodeling markers: assessment of fracture risk and fracture risk reduction.

Authors:  Aubrey Blumsohn
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  Superiority of alfacalcidol over plain vitamin D in the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Authors:  J D Ringe; A Dorst; H Faber; E Schacht; V W Rahlfs
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2003-09-25       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 9.  Bone quality: the determinants of bone strength and fragility.

Authors:  Hélder Fonseca; Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves; Hans-Joachim Appell Coriolano; José Alberto Duarte
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  [Osteoporosis--which therapy is confirmed?].

Authors:  P M Jehle; J Pfeilschifter
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 0.743

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.