Literature DB >> 16050831

Optimal combination of discriminators for differentiating ventricular from supraventricular tachycardia by dual-chamber defibrillators.

Michael Glikson1, Charles D Swerdlow, Osnat T Gurevitz, Emile Daoud, Kalyanam Shivkumar, Bruce Wilkoff, Tamara Shipman, Paul A Friedman.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Discriminators for ventricular/supraventricular tachycardia.
INTRODUCTION: Dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) use discriminators to differentiate between supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs) and ventricular tachycardias (VT), the accuracy of which may depend on the type and method used. ICDs can combine rate branching of tachyarrhythmias according to their A:V relationship with two SVT-VT discriminators in each rate branch, using ANY (either) or ALL (both) logic. Our goal was to determine the optimal discriminator combination.
METHODS: Stored electrogram data from 596 spontaneous tachyarrhythmias from 203 patients with Photon DR ICDs were analyzed. Arrhythmias are first classified by the relationship of atrial and ventricular rates (rate branches V<A, V=A, and V>A) followed by additional discriminators: morphology and/or sudden onset if V=A; morphology and/or interval stability if V<A. Data were analyzed for all combinations of ANY and ALL logic.
RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for all spontaneous episodes in each analysis. V=A branch: ALL logic produced unacceptably low sensitivity, whereas morphology provided only similar sensitivity but better specificity than ANY logic. A>V branch: ANY logic provided adequate sensitivity. The combination of morphology only in V=A with interval stability or morphology (ANY logic) in V<A, provided the optimal result with sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of 99%, 79%, 87%, and 98%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: SVT-VT combined discriminators strongly influence dual-chamber SVT-VT discrimination performance. In our study, optimal programming is morphology only in the V=A branch and morphology or interval stability (ANY) in the V<A branch. ALL logic should be used with caution due to loss of sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16050831     DOI: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2005.40643.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  8 in total

Review 1.  Strategic choices to reduce implantable cardioverter-defibrillator-related morbidity.

Authors:  Oussama Wazni; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Recollection of pain due to inappropriate versus appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks.

Authors:  Gregory M Marcus; Derrick W Chan; Rita F Redberg
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  Does the rate of inappropriate therapy differ in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators from different manufacturers?

Authors:  Arash Arya; Majid Haghjoo; Zahra Emkanjoo; Mohammad Reza Dehghani; Mohammad Ali Sadr-Ameli
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  Basic Properties And Clinical Applications Of The Intracardiac.

Authors:  Francesco Zanon; Lina Marcantoni; Gianni Pastore; Enrico Baracca; Silvio Aggio; Franco Di Gregorio; Alberto Barbetta; Mauro Carraro; Claudio Picariello; Luca Conte; Loris Roncon
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-12-31

5.  Electrical And Hemodynamic Evalution Of Ventricular And Supraventricular Tachycardias With An Implantable Dual-Chamber Pacemaker.

Authors:  Claudio Pandozi; Franco Di Gregorio; Carlo Lavalle; Renato Pietro Ricci; Sabina Ficili; Marco Galeazzi; Maurizio Russo; Angela Pandozi; Furio Colivicchi; Massimo Santini
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2014-06-30

Review 6.  Inappropriate shocks in patients with ICDs: single chamber versus dual chamber.

Authors:  Juliana Gonçalves; Telmo Pereira
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing.

Authors:  Bruce L Wilkoff; Laurent Fauchier; Martin K Stiles; Carlos A Morillo; Sana M Al-Khatib; Jesœs Almendral; Luis Aguinaga; Ronald D Berger; Alejandro Cuesta; James P Daubert; Sergio Dubner; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; N A Mark Estes; Guilherme Fenelon; Fermin C Garcia; Maurizio Gasparini; David E Haines; Jeff S Healey; Jodie L Hurtwitz; Roberto Keegan; Christof Kolb; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Germanas Marinskis; Martino Martinelli; Mark McGuire; Luis G Molina; Ken Okumura; Alessandro Proclemer; Andrea M Russo; Jagmeet P Singh; Charles D Swerdlow; Wee Siong Teo; William Uribe; Sami Viskin; Chun-Chieh Wang; Shu Zhang
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2016-02-01

Review 8.  Successful Identification of and Discrimination Between Atrial and Ventricular Arrhythmia with the Aid of Pacing and Defibrillator Devices.

Authors:  Rahul K Mukherjee; Manav Sohal; Nesan Shanmugam; Simon Pearse; Fadi Jouhra
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2021-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.