Literature DB >> 29250250

Basic Properties And Clinical Applications Of The Intracardiac.

Francesco Zanon1, Lina Marcantoni1, Gianni Pastore1, Enrico Baracca1, Silvio Aggio2, Franco Di Gregorio3, Alberto Barbetta3, Mauro Carraro2, Claudio Picariello2, Luca Conte2, Loris Roncon2.   

Abstract

The electric signals detected by intracardiac electrodes provide information on the occurrence and timing of myocardial depolarization, but are not generally helpful to characterize the nature and origin of the sensed event. A novel recording technique referred to as intracardiac ECG (iECG) has overcome this limitation. The iECG is a multipolar signal, which combines the input from both atrial and ventricular electrodes of a dual-chamber pacing system in order to assess the global electric activity of the heart. The tracing resembles a surface ECG lead, featuring P, QRS and T waves. The time-course of the waveform representing ventricular depolarization (iQRS) does correspond to the time-course of the surface QRS with any ventricular activation modality. Morphological variants of the iQRS waveform are specifically associated with each activity pattern, which can therefore be diagnosed by evaluation of the iECG tracing. In the event of tachycardia, SVTs with narrow QRS can be distinguished from other arrhythmia forms based upon the preservation of the same iQRS waveform recorded in sinus rhythm. In ventricular capture surveillance, real pacing failure can be reliably discriminated from fusion beats by the analysis of the area delimited by the iQRS signal. Assessing the iQRS waveform correspondence with a reference template could be a way to check the effectiveness of biventricular pacing, and to discriminate myocardial capture alone from additional His bundle recruitment in para-Hisian stimulation. The iECG is not intended as an alternative to conventional intracavitary sensing, which remains the only tool suitable to drive the sensing function of a pacing device. Nevertheless, this new electric signal can add the benefits of morphological data processing, which might have important implications on the quality of the pacing therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRT; Cardiac electrograms; Fusion detection; Hisian pacing

Year:  2016        PMID: 29250250      PMCID: PMC5673309          DOI: 10.4022/jafib.1444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation        ISSN: 1941-6911


  28 in total

1.  Comparison of effectiveness of right ventricular septal pacing versus right ventricular apical pacing.

Authors:  Oscar Cano; Joaquín Osca; María-José Sancho-Tello; Juan M Sánchez; Víctor Ortiz; José E Castro; Antonio Salvador; José Olagüe
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  The hemodynamic effect of intrinsic conduction during left ventricular pacing as compared to biventricular pacing.

Authors:  Berry M van Gelder; Frank A Bracke; Albert Meijer; Nico H J Pijls
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Direct His bundle and paraHisian cardiac pacing.

Authors:  Francesco Zanon; S S Barold
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Morphology of far-field electrograms and antitachycardia pacing effectiveness among fast ventricular tachycardias occurring in ICD patients: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Javier Jiménez-Candil; Ignasi Anguera; Claudio Ledesma; Javier Fernández-Portales; José Luis Moríñigo; Paolo Dallaglio; Ana Martín; Teresa Cano; Jesús Hernández; Xavier Sabaté; Cándido Martín-Luengo
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-09-09

Review 5.  Beneficial effects of right ventricular non-apical vs. apical pacing: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.

Authors:  Avi Shimony; Mark J Eisenberg; Kristian B Filion; Guy Amit
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 5.214

6.  A cardiac evoked response algorithm providing threshold tracking: a North American multicenter study. Clinical Investigators of the Microny-Regency Clinical Evaluation Study.

Authors:  C Lau; D A Cameron; S C Nishimura; T Ahern; R A Freedman; K Ellenbogen; S Greenberg; J Baker; D Meacham
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Clinical performance of a ventricular automatic capture verification algorithm.

Authors:  Johannes Sperzel; Charles Kennergren; Mauro Biffi; Mitchell Smith; Marie Knops; Jaswinder Gill; Jean Boland
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.976

8.  Optimal combination of discriminators for differentiating ventricular from supraventricular tachycardia by dual-chamber defibrillators.

Authors:  Michael Glikson; Charles D Swerdlow; Osnat T Gurevitz; Emile Daoud; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Bruce Wilkoff; Tamara Shipman; Paul A Friedman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-07

9.  Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating left ventricular vs. biventricular pacing in heart failure: effect on all-cause mortality and hospitalizations.

Authors:  Giuseppe Boriani; Beatrice Gardini; Igor Diemberger; Maria Letizia Bacchi Reggiani; Mauro Biffi; Cristian Martignani; Matteo Ziacchi; Cinzia Valzania; Maurizio Gasparini; Luigi Padeletti; Angelo Branzi
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 15.534

10.  Electrical And Hemodynamic Evalution Of Ventricular And Supraventricular Tachycardias With An Implantable Dual-Chamber Pacemaker.

Authors:  Claudio Pandozi; Franco Di Gregorio; Carlo Lavalle; Renato Pietro Ricci; Sabina Ficili; Marco Galeazzi; Maurizio Russo; Angela Pandozi; Furio Colivicchi; Massimo Santini
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2014-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.