Literature DB >> 20047875

Riding across the selection landscape: fitness consequences of annual variation in reproductive characteristics.

Raymond L Tremblay1, James D Ackerman, Maria-Eglée Pérez.   

Abstract

Evolutionary models estimating phenotypic selection in character size usually assume that the character is invariant across reproductive bouts. We show that variation in the size of reproductive traits may be large over multiple events and can influence fitness in organisms where these traits are produced anew each season. With data from populations of two orchid species, Caladenia valida and Tolumnia variegata, we used Bayesian statistics to investigate the effect on the distribution in fitness of individuals when the fitness landscape is not flat and when characters vary across reproductive bouts. Inconsistency in character size across reproductive periods within an individual increases the uncertainty of mean fitness and, consequently, the uncertainty in individual fitness. The trajectory of selection is likely to be muddled as a consequence of variation in morphology of individuals across reproductive bouts. The frequency and amplitude of such changes will certainly affect the dynamics between selection and genetic drift.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20047875      PMCID: PMC2838265          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  10 in total

Review 1.  The role of phenotypic plasticity in driving genetic evolution.

Authors:  Trevor D Price; Anna Qvarnström; Darren E Irwin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Evolution of the environmental component of the phenotypic variance: stabilizing selection in changing environments and the cost of homogeneity.

Authors:  Xu-Sheng Zhang; William G Hill
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Influence of plasticity and learning on evolution under directional selection.

Authors:  Ingo Paenke; Bernhard Sendhoff; Tadeusz J Kawecki
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Expected relative fitness and the adaptive topography of fluctuating selection.

Authors:  Russell Lande
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Adaptation to an extraordinary environment by evolution of phenotypic plasticity and genetic assimilation.

Authors:  Russell Lande
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 6.  Darwin's beautiful contrivances: evolutionary and functional evidence for floral adaptation.

Authors:  Lawrence D Harder; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 10.151

7.  Adaptive topography of fluctuating selection in a Mendelian population.

Authors:  R Lande
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 2.411

8.  Variation in pollinator abundance and selection on fragrance phenotypes in an epiphytic orchid.

Authors:  J Ackerman; E Melendez-Ackerman; J Salguero-Faria
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.844

9.  Reproductive uncertainty and the relative competitiveness of simultaneous hermaphroditism versus dioecy.

Authors:  W G Wilson; L D Harder
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-07-16       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  A stochastic version of the Price equation reveals the interplay of deterministic and stochastic processes in evolution.

Authors:  Sean H Rice
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 3.260

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Darwin and the evolution of flowers.

Authors:  Peter R Crane; Else Marie Friis; William G Chaloner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Fluctuating selection across years and phenotypic variation in food-deceptive orchids.

Authors:  Giovanni Scopece; Nicolas Juillet; Christian Lexer; Salvatore Cozzolino
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 2.984

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.