Literature DB >> 16048773

Synergistic effects of combining morphological and molecular data in resolving the phylogeny of butterflies and skippers.

Niklas Wahlberg1, Michael F Braby, Andrew V Z Brower, Rienk de Jong, Ming-Min Lee, Sören Nylin, Naomi E Pierce, Felix A H Sperling, Roger Vila, Andrew D Warren, Evgueni Zakharov.   

Abstract

Phylogenetic relationships among major clades of butterflies and skippers have long been controversial, with no general consensus even today. Such lack of resolution is a substantial impediment to using the otherwise well studied butterflies as a model group in biology. Here we report the results of a combined analysis of DNA sequences from three genes and a morphological data matrix for 57 taxa (3258 characters, 1290 parsimony informative) representing all major lineages from the three putative butterfly super-families (Hedyloidea, Hesperioidea and Papilionoidea), plus out-groups representing other ditrysian Lepidoptera families. Recently, the utility of morphological data as a source of phylogenetic evidence has been debated. We present the first well supported phylogenetic hypothesis for the butterflies and skippers based on a total-evidence analysis of both traditional morphological characters and new molecular characters from three gene regions (COI, EF-1alpha and wingless). All four data partitions show substantial hidden support for the deeper nodes, which emerges only in a combined analysis in which the addition of morphological data plays a crucial role. With the exception of Nymphalidae, the traditionally recognized families are found to be strongly supported monophyletic clades with the following relationships: (Hesperiidae+(Papilionidae+(Pieridae+(Nymphalidae+(Lycaenidae+Riodinidae))))). Nymphalidae is recovered as a monophyletic clade but this clade does not have strong support. Lycaenidae and Riodinidae are sister groups with strong support and we suggest that the latter be given family rank. The position of Pieridae as the sister taxon to nymphalids, lycaenids and riodinids is supported by morphology and the EF-1alpha data but conflicted by the COI and wingless data. Hedylidae are more likely to be related to butterflies and skippers than geometrid moths and appear to be the sister group to Papilionoidea+Hesperioidea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16048773      PMCID: PMC1560179          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  15 in total

Review 1.  The current state of insect molecular systematics: a thriving Tower of Babel.

Authors:  M S Caterino; S Cho; F A Sperling
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Phylogenetic relationships among the Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera) inferred from partial sequences of the wingless gene.

Authors:  A V Brower
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology.

Authors:  J P Huelsenbeck; F Ronquist; R Nielsen; J P Bollback
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-12-14       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Biological identifications through DNA barcodes.

Authors:  Paul D N Hebert; Alina Cywinska; Shelley L Ball; Jeremy R deWaard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  A partitioned likelihood analysis of swallowtail butterfly phylogeny (Lepidoptera:Papilionidae).

Authors:  M S Caterino; R D Reed; M M Kuo; F A Sperling
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 15.683

6.  Phylogeny reconstruction: the role of morphology.

Authors:  Robert W Scotland; Richard G Olmstead; Jonathan R Bennett
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 15.683

7.  MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models.

Authors:  Fredrik Ronquist; John P Huelsenbeck
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Assessing the relative contribution of molecular and morphological characters in simultaneous analysis trees.

Authors:  R H Baker; X Yu; R DeSalle
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.286

9.  Phylogeny of Bicyclus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) inferred from COI, COII, and EF-1alpha gene sequences.

Authors:  A Monteiro; N E Pierce
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.286

10.  Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian drosophilids.

Authors:  R H Baker; R DeSalle
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 15.683

View more
  47 in total

1.  Comprehensive gene and taxon coverage elucidates radiation patterns in moths and butterflies.

Authors:  Marko Mutanen; Niklas Wahlberg; Lauri Kaila
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Craniodental and Postcranial Characters of Non-Avian Dinosauria Often Imply Different Trees.

Authors:  Yimeng Li; Marcello Ruta; Matthew A Wills
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  Light on the moth-eye corneal nipple array of butterflies.

Authors:  D G Stavenga; S Foletti; G Palasantzas; K Arikawa
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The importance of amino acids in the adult diet of male tropical rainforest butterflies.

Authors:  Jan Beck
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The genetic basis of a plant-insect coevolutionary key innovation.

Authors:  Christopher W Wheat; Heiko Vogel; Ute Wittstock; Michael F Braby; Dessie Underwood; Thomas Mitchell-Olds
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Description of new mitochondrial genomes (Spodoptera litura, Noctuoidea and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis, Pyraloidea) and phylogenetic reconstruction of Lepidoptera with the comment on optimization schemes.

Authors:  Xinlong Wan; Min Jee Kim; Iksoo Kim
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 2.316

7.  Nymphalid butterflies diversify following near demise at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary.

Authors:  Niklas Wahlberg; Julien Leneveu; Ullasa Kodandaramaiah; Carlos Peña; Sören Nylin; André V L Freitas; Andrew V Z Brower
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Cretaceous origin and repeated tertiary diversification of the redefined butterflies.

Authors:  Maria Heikkilä; Lauri Kaila; Marko Mutanen; Carlos Peña; Niklas Wahlberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Evolutionary patterns in pearl oysters of the genus Pinctada (Bivalvia: Pteriidae).

Authors:  Regina L Cunha; Françoise Blanc; François Bonhomme; Sophie Arnaud-Haond
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 3.619

10.  Evidence of repeated and independent saltational evolution in a peculiar genus of sphinx moths (Proserpinus: Sphingidae).

Authors:  Daniel Rubinoff; Johannes J Le Roux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.