Literature DB >> 20349098

Evolutionary patterns in pearl oysters of the genus Pinctada (Bivalvia: Pteriidae).

Regina L Cunha1, Françoise Blanc, François Bonhomme, Sophie Arnaud-Haond.   

Abstract

Pearl oysters belonging to the genus Pinctada (Bivalvia: Pteriidae) are widely distributed between the Indo-Pacific and western Atlantic. The existence of both widely distributed and more restricted species makes this group a suitable model to study diversification patterns and prevailing modes of speciation. Phylogenies of eight out of the 11 currently recognised Pinctada species using mitochondrial (cox1) and nuclear (18S rRNA) data yielded two monophyletic groups that correspond to shell size and presence/absence of hinge teeth. Character trace of these morphological characters onto the molecular phylogeny revealed a strong correlation. Pinctada margaritifera appears polyphyletic with specimens from Mauritius grouping in a different clade from others of the French Polynesia and Japan. Hence, P. margaritifera might represent a species complex, and specimens from Mauritius could represent a different species. Regarding the putative species complex Pinctada fucata/Pinctada martensii/Pinctada radiata/Pinctada imbricata, our molecular analyses question the taxonomic validity of the morphological characters used to discriminate P. fucata and P. martensii that exhibited the lowest genetic divergence and are most likely conspecific as they clustered together. P. radiata and P. imbricata were recovered as monophyletic. The absence of overlapping distributions between sister lineages and the observed isolation by distance suggests that allopatry is the prevailing speciation mode in Pinctada. Bayesian dating analysis indicated a Miocene origin for the genus, which is consistent with the fossil record. The northward movement of the Australian plate throughout the Miocene played an important role in the diversification process within Pinctada.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20349098     DOI: 10.1007/s10126-010-9278-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)        ISSN: 1436-2228            Impact factor:   3.619


  25 in total

1.  Dispersal barriers in tropical oceans and speciation in Atlantic and eastern Pacific sea urchins of the genus Echinometra.

Authors:  M A McCartney; G Keller; H A Lessios
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Evidence for male-biased effective sex ratio and recent step-by-step colonization in the bivalve Pinctada mazatlanica.

Authors:  S Arnaud-Haond; M Monteforte; F Blanc; F Bonhomme
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.411

3.  Synergistic effects of combining morphological and molecular data in resolving the phylogeny of butterflies and skippers.

Authors:  Niklas Wahlberg; Michael F Braby; Andrew V Z Brower; Rienk de Jong; Ming-Min Lee; Sören Nylin; Naomi E Pierce; Felix A H Sperling; Roger Vila; Andrew D Warren; Evgueni Zakharov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Assessing calibration uncertainty in molecular dating: the assignment of fossils to alternative calibration points.

Authors:  Frank Rutschmann; Torsten Eriksson; Kamariah Abu Salim; Elena Conti
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 15.683

5.  Rapid speciation and ecological divergence in the American seven-spined gobies (Gobiidae, Gobiosomatini) inferred from a molecular phylogeny.

Authors:  Lukas Rüber; James L Van Tassell; Rafael Zardoya
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Diversification in the tropical pacific: comparisons between marine and terrestrial systems and the importance of founder speciation.

Authors:  Gustav Paulay; Chris Meyer
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.326

7.  Dispersal and divergence across the greatest ocean region: Do larvae matter?

Authors:  Gustav Paulay; Christopher Meyer
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 3.326

8.  The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools.

Authors:  J D Thompson; T J Gibson; F Plewniak; F Jeanmougin; D G Higgins
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  INFERRING PHYLOGENIES FROM mtDNA VARIATION: MITOCHONDRIAL-GENE TREES VERSUS NUCLEAR-GENE TREES.

Authors:  William S Moore
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence.

Authors:  Alexei J Drummond; Simon Y W Ho; Matthew J Phillips; Andrew Rambaut
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  15 in total

1.  Different secretory repertoires control the biomineralization processes of prism and nacre deposition of the pearl oyster shell.

Authors:  Benjamin Marie; Caroline Joubert; Alexandre Tayalé; Isabelle Zanella-Cléon; Corinne Belliard; David Piquemal; Nathalie Cochennec-Laureau; Frédéric Marin; Yannick Gueguen; Caroline Montagnani
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Rapid evolution of pearl oyster shell matrix proteins with repetitive, low-complexity domains.

Authors:  Carmel McDougall; Felipe Aguilera; Bernard M Degnan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Unifying latitudinal gradients in range size and richness across marine and terrestrial systems.

Authors:  Adam Tomašových; Jonathan D Kennedy; Tristan J Betzner; Nicole Bitler Kuehnle; Stewart Edie; Sora Kim; K Supriya; Alexander E White; Carsten Rahbek; Shan Huang; Trevor D Price; David Jablonski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Gigabase-scale transcriptome analysis on four species of pearl oysters.

Authors:  Xian-De Huang; Mi Zhao; Wen-Guang Liu; Yun-Yan Guan; Yu Shi; Qi Wang; Shan-Zeng Wu; Mao-Xian He
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Genome-wide SNP validation and mantle tissue transcriptome analysis in the silver-lipped pearl oyster, Pinctada maxima.

Authors:  David B Jones; Dean R Jerry; Sylvain Forêt; Dmitry A Konovalov; Kyall R Zenger
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.619

6.  A high-density SNP genetic linkage map for the silver-lipped pearl oyster, Pinctada maxima: a valuable resource for gene localisation and marker-assisted selection.

Authors:  David B Jones; Dean R Jerry; Mehar S Khatkar; Herman W Raadsma; Kyall R Zenger
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Bivalve-specific gene expansion in the pearl oyster genome: implications of adaptation to a sessile lifestyle.

Authors:  Takeshi Takeuchi; Ryo Koyanagi; Fuki Gyoja; Miyuki Kanda; Kanako Hisata; Manabu Fujie; Hiroki Goto; Shinichi Yamasaki; Kiyohito Nagai; Yoshiaki Morino; Hiroshi Miyamoto; Kazuyoshi Endo; Hirotoshi Endo; Hiromichi Nagasawa; Shigeharu Kinoshita; Shuichi Asakawa; Shugo Watabe; Noriyuki Satoh; Takeshi Kawashima
Journal:  Zoological Lett       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 2.836

8.  Genome-wide comparisons reveal evidence for a species complex in the black-lip pearl oyster Pinctada margaritifera (Bivalvia: Pteriidae).

Authors:  Monal M Lal; Paul C Southgate; Dean R Jerry; Kyall R Zenger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Swept away: ocean currents and seascape features influence genetic structure across the 18,000 Km Indo-Pacific distribution of a marine invertebrate, the black-lip pearl oyster Pinctada margaritifera.

Authors:  Monal M Lal; Paul C Southgate; Dean R Jerry; Cyprien Bosserelle; Kyall R Zenger
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  DNA fingerprinting of pearls to determine their origins.

Authors:  Joana B Meyer; Laurent E Cartier; Eric A Pinto-Figueroa; Michael S Krzemnicki; Henry A Hänni; Bruce A McDonald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.