Literature DB >> 12485634

Model-guided derivation of lumbar vertebral kinematics in vivo reveals the difference between external marker-defined and internal segmental rotations.

Xudong Zhang1, Jinjun Xiong.   

Abstract

This study investigated whether the external marker-defined spine inter-segmental rotation is different from the internal vertebral rotation, and explored how to estimate the latter from limited surface measurement. A kinematic model was first created to elucidate analytically the relation between the external and internal rotations. A novel approach guided by the model was proposed for deriving vertebral centers of rotation (CORs) from measured planar trajectories of skin-surface markers. The approach involved a recursive procedure for establishing local (anatomical) coordinate systems, and an optimization routine that identified the maximum-likelihood circles best fitting the marker trajectories in local coordinate systems. An experiment with 10 subjects (5 males and 5 females) was conducted to test the approach along with the model. Skin-surface markers were strategically placed over individual spinous processes and other body landmarks, and recorded by an opto-electronic system while sagittally symmetric load-lifting movements were being performed. For the majority (89%) of measured motions, the COR locations for lumbar vertebrae (L2-L5) were derived successfully: solutions resulting from the optimization routine met a convergence criterion governed by the model, and were in agreement with existing data from radiographic or cadaveric studies. Empirical results confirmed the differences between the external marker-defined inter-segmental motions and corresponding internal vertebral rotations (1.1-5.8 degrees on average, all statistically significant). The study demonstrated the necessity and viability of quantifying internal vertebral kinematics when utilizing non-invasive marker-based measurement for spine-related clinical diagnosis and biomechanical modeling. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12485634     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00323-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  6 in total

1.  Three-dimensional relation of skin markers to lumbar vertebrae of healthy subjects in different postures measured by open MRI.

Authors:  Falk Mörl; Reinhard Blickhan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.

Authors:  Babak Bazrgari; Aboulfazl Shirazi-Adl; Navid Arjmand
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Kinematics of the lumbar spine in elderly subjects with decreased bone mineral density.

Authors:  Heather Ting Ma; James F Griffith; Zhengyi Yang; Anthony Wai Leung Kwok; Ping Chung Leung; Raymond Y W Lee
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  An objective spinal motion imaging assessment (OSMIA): reliability, accuracy and exposure data.

Authors:  Alan C Breen; Jennifer M Muggleton; Fiona E Mellor
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Rasterstereographic measurement of scoliotic deformity.

Authors:  Burkhard Drerup
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2014-12-12

Review 6.  Have Studies that Measure Lumbar Kinematics and Muscle Activity Concurrently during Sagittal Bending Improved Understanding of Spinal Stability and Sub-System Interactions? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alister du Rose
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.