Literature DB >> 10908936

Cineradiographic motion analysis of normal lumbar spine during forward and backward flexion.

M Harada1, K Abumi, M Ito, K Kaneda.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Motion characteristics of the lumbar spine in the sagittal plane were investigated in vivo using cineradiography.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the differences in motion characteristics of the normal lumbar spine between forward and backward flexion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Despite previous lumbar kinematic studies, differences in motion characteristics of the lumbar spine between forward and backward flexion remain unclear.
METHODS: Cineradiographic motion analysis was performed in 10 asymptomatic healthy male volunteers for two different lumbar motions. The motions consisted of active forward flexion (from maximum extension to maximum flexion) and active backward flexion (from maximum flexion to maximum extension). Displacements of the anterior and posterior vertebral corners from L3/L4 to L5/S1 were measured continuously in reference to the local coordinate system. Parameters investigated were onset of segmental motion, velocity of segmental motion, and continuous motion profiles of the vertebral corners during the two different motions.
RESULTS: During forward flexion, initial lumbar motion started stepwise from the upper level (L3/L4) to the lower levels with phase lags. Angular velocity at the onset of motion increased as the level descended. On the contrary, during backward flexion, initial motion started from the lower level (L5/S1) to the upper levels. There was no relation between velocity and spinal levels during backward flexion. Motion profiles of both anterior and posterior vertebral corners at L3/L4 and L4/L5 segments during forward flexion were similar to those during backward flexion. However, the motion profiles at L5/S1 segment during forward flexion were different from those during backward flexion.
CONCLUSIONS: During forward flexion of the lumbar spine, initial motion started from upper segments to the lower segments with phase lags. During backward flexion, initial motion started from the lower segments to the upper segments. Motion profiles of the vertebral corners during forward flexion were similar to those during backward flexion at L3/L4 and L4/L5. The motion profiles at L5/S1 were different between both flexions.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10908936     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200008010-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  14 in total

1.  Segmental lumbar rotation in patients with discogenic low back pain during functional weight-bearing activities.

Authors:  Peter G Passias; Shaobai Wang; Michal Kozanek; Qun Xia; Weishi Li; Brian Grottkau; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Reliability of motion measurements after total disc replacement: the spike and the fin method.

Authors:  Balkan Cakir; Marcus Richter; Wolfhart Puhl; René Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Three-dimensional relation of skin markers to lumbar vertebrae of healthy subjects in different postures measured by open MRI.

Authors:  Falk Mörl; Reinhard Blickhan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The effect of loading rate and degeneration on neutral region motion in human cadaveric lumbar motion segments.

Authors:  Ralph E Gay; Brice Ilharreborde; Kristin Zhao; Emir Boumediene; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  The quantitative measurements of the intervertebral angulation and translation during cervical flexion and extension.

Authors:  Shyi-Kuen Wu; Li-Chieh Kuo; Haw-Chang H Lan; Sen-Wei Tsai; Chiung-Ling Chen; Fong-Chin Su
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Kinematic analysis of dynamic lumbar motion in patients with lumbar segmental instability using digital videofluoroscopy.

Authors:  Amir Ahmadi; Nader Maroufi; Hamid Behtash; Hajar Zekavat; Mohamad Parnianpour
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Is L5-S1 motion segment different from the rest? A radiographic kinematic assessment of 72 patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Ashutosh B Sabnis; Uphar Chamoli; Ashish D Diwan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Differential segmental motion contribution of single- and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Andy Chien; Dar-Ming Lai; Shwu-Fen Wang; Chih-Hsiu Cheng; Wei-Li Hsu; Jaw-Lin Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Uneven intervertebral motion sharing is related to disc degeneration and is greater in patients with chronic, non-specific low back pain: an in vivo, cross-sectional cohort comparison of intervertebral dynamics using quantitative fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Alan Breen; Alexander Breen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Kinetic magnetic resonance imaging analysis of lumbar segmental mobility in patients without significant spondylosis.

Authors:  Yanlin Tan; Bayan G Aghdasi; Scott R Montgomery; Hirokazu Inoue; Chang Lu; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.